Governance (Civ. Competence)
Page Status
Quality:0 (Stub)
Importance:0 (Peripheral)
Structure:
📊 0📈 0🔗 0📚 0•0%Score: 2/15
LLM Summary:This is a placeholder page with no actual content - only component imports that would render data from elsewhere in the system. Cannot assess importance or quality without the underlying content.
Critical Insights (4):
- Quant.72% of humanity lives under autocracy (up from 45 countries autocratizing 2004 to 83+ in 2024), and 83+ countries have deployed AI surveillance - AI likely accelerates authoritarian lock-in.S:3.5I:4.5A:3.5
- Quant.Hikvision/Dahua control 34% of global surveillance market with 400M cameras in China (54% of global total) - surveillance infrastructure concentration enables authoritarian AI applications.S:3.0I:3.8A:3.2
- NeglectedNon-Western perspectives on AI governance are systematically underrepresented in safety discourse, creating potential blind spots and reducing policy legitimacy.S:2.5I:3.5A:3.8
Issues (1):
- StructureNo tables or diagrams - consider adding visual content
Effectiveness of governance systems in navigating AI transition, including regulatory capacity, policy adaptation, and international coordination mechanisms.
What Affects Governance Effectiveness?
Causal factors affecting governance capacity for AI transition. AISI budgets ~$10-50M vs $100B+ industry spending.
Computing layout...
Legend
Node Types
Root Causes
Derived
Direct Factors
Target
Arrow Strength
Strong
Medium
Weak
Scenarios Influenced
| Scenario | Effect | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| AI Takeover | ↓ Decreases | medium |
| Human-Caused Catastrophe | ↓ Decreases | medium |
| Long-term Lock-in | — | strong |