Skip to content
LongtermWiki

Content Quality Dashboard

This dashboard provides an overview of content quality, staleness tracking, and entity relationship health across the knowledge base.

Summary Statistics

Section titled “Summary Statistics”
380
Total Entities
61
Risks
38
Responses
78
Models
3.4
Avg Quality
149
Gaps Found

Quality Distribution

Section titled “Quality Distribution”
65
0
Unrated
11
1
Stub
45
2
Draft
151
3
Adequate
165
4
Good
33
5
Excellent
Low Quality (1-2)
56
Needs significant improvement
Adequate (3)
151
Meets basic standards
High Quality (4-5)
198
Well-developed content
Average Quality Score3.4 / 5.0

Content by Type

Section titled “Content by Type”
TypeCount
model78
ai-transition-model-subitem57
risk54
researcher28
ai-transition-model-parameter22
concept21
policy21
crux12
capability11
organization11
ai-transition-model-metric10
ai-transition-model-scenario10
intervention9
safety-agenda8
ai-transition-model-factor7
lab-research6
historical5
argument4
lab4
analysis1
lab-academic1

Recently Updated

Section titled “Recently Updated”
EntityLast Updated
Misalignment Potential2026-01
Misuse Potential2026-01
AI Capabilities2026-01
AI Uses2026-01
AI Ownership2026-01
Civilizational Competence2026-01
Transition Turbulence2026-01
Existential Catastrophe2026-01
Long-term Trajectory2026-01
Compute2026-01

Entity Gaps

Section titled “Entity Gaps”

Risks Without Responses

Section titled “Risks Without Responses”

These risks don’t have any response pages linking to them:

  • Misalignment Potential (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • Misuse Potential (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • AI Capabilities (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • AI Uses (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • AI Ownership (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • Civilizational Competence (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • Transition Turbulence (ai-transition-model-factor)
  • AI Authoritarian Tools (risk)
  • Autonomous Weapons (risk)
  • Cyber Psychosis (risk)
  • ...and 14 more
Section titled “Responses Without Risk Links”

These response pages don’t link to any risks:

  • AI Safety Institutes (AISIs) (policy)
  • Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (policy)
  • Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) (policy)
  • China AI Regulatory Framework (policy)
  • Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (policy)
  • Compute Thresholds (policy)
  • Compute Monitoring (policy)
  • International Compute Regimes (policy)
  • EU AI Act (policy)
  • US AI Chip Export Controls (policy)
  • ...and 14 more

Orphaned Entities

Section titled “Orphaned Entities”

These entities have no incoming or outgoing links:

  • Compute Forecast Model Sketch (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Existential Catastrophe (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Long-term Trajectory (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Societal Adaptability (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • AI Control Concentration (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Alignment Robustness (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Biological Threat Exposure (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Coordination Capacity (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Cyber Threat Exposure (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • Economic Stability (ai-transition-model-subitem)
  • ...and 91 more

Enhancement Queue

Section titled “Enhancement Queue”

Pages prioritized for improvement based on (importance - quality × 10). High importance + low quality = priority target for enhancement.

PageQualityImportanceGapCategory
Safe Superintelligence Inc (SSI)457530organizations
Expected Value of AI Safety Research588224models
Reality Fragmentation285224risks
EU AI Act557823responses
Large Language Models608222capabilities
Regulatory Capacity Threshold Model507222models
When Will AGI Arrive?335421debates
The Case FOR AI Existential Risk668721debates
Flash Dynamics Threshold Model557621models
Instrumental Convergence Framework587820models
Scheming Likelihood Assessment638320models
Dangerous Capability Evaluations648420responses
RLHF / Constitutional AI638320responses
Corrigibility Failure628220risks
Power-Seeking AI678720risks

To improve these pages, use the /improving-pages skill or run:

Terminal window
npm run crux -- content improve <page-id>
Section titled “Link Health”
69
Total Links
65
Valid Links
0
Broken Links
94%
Health Score

To get current link health status, run:

Terminal window
npm run crux -- validate refs

Running Validation

Section titled “Running Validation”

To run the full validation suite locally:

Terminal window
npm run validate

Individual validators:

Terminal window
npm run crux -- validate templates     # Template compliance
npm run crux -- validate data          # Entity data integrity
npm run crux -- validate refs          # Internal link validation
npm run crux -- validate unified       # Formatting and escaping rules