Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
The International AI Safety Summit series represents the first sustained effort at global coordination on AI safety, bringing together governments, AI companies, civil society, and researchers to address the risks from advanced AI.
US AI Safety Institute (now CAISI)OrganizationUS AI Safety Institute (now CAISI)The US AI Safety Institute (AISI), established November 2023 within NIST with $10M budget (FY2025 request $82.7M), conducted pre-deployment evaluations of frontier models through MOUs with OpenAI a...Quality: 91/100AnthropicOrganizationAnthropicComprehensive reference page on Anthropic covering financials ($380B valuation, $14B ARR at Series G growing to $19B by March 2026), safety research (Constitutional AI, mechanistic interpretability...Quality: 74/100OpenAIOrganizationOpenAIComprehensive organizational profile of OpenAI documenting evolution from 2015 non-profit to Public Benefit Corporation, with detailed analysis of governance crisis, 2024-2025 ownership restructuri...Quality: 62/100Google DeepMindOrganizationGoogle DeepMindComprehensive overview of DeepMind's history, achievements (AlphaGo, AlphaFold with 200M+ protein structures), and 2023 merger with Google Brain. Documents racing dynamics with OpenAI and new Front...Quality: 37/100Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceOrganizationCarnegie Endowment for International PeaceA competent reference entry on Carnegie Endowment for International Peace covering its AI governance work, relationship to the AI safety community, and institutional limitations; useful as an organ...
Concepts
Governance OverviewGovernance OverviewComprehensive reference overview of AI governance mechanisms across jurisdictions as of mid-2026, covering mandatory legislation, compute controls, international coordination, and industry self-reg...Quality: 84/100International Coordination MechanismsConceptInternational Coordination MechanismsComprehensive analysis of international AI coordination mechanisms shows growing but limited progress: 11-country AI Safety Institute network with ~$200M budget expanding to include India; Council ...Quality: 91/100
Policy
AI Safety Institutes (AISIs)PolicyAI Safety Institutes (AISIs)Analysis of government AI Safety Institutes finding they've achieved rapid institutional growth (UK: 0→100+ staff in 18 months) and secured pre-deployment access to frontier models, but face critic...Quality: 69/100Bletchley DeclarationPolicyBletchley DeclarationThe Bletchley Declaration represents a significant diplomatic achievement in establishing international consensus on AI safety cooperation among 28 countries including the US and China, though its ...Quality: 60/100EU AI ActPolicyEU AI ActComprehensive overview of the EU AI Act's risk-based regulatory framework, particularly its two-tier approach to foundation models that distinguishes between standard and systemic risk AI systems. ...Quality: 55/100
Approaches
AI EvaluationApproachAI EvaluationComprehensive overview of AI evaluation methods spanning dangerous capability assessment, safety properties, and deception detection, with categorized frameworks from industry (Anthropic Constituti...Quality: 72/100AI Governance Coordination TechnologiesApproachAI Governance Coordination TechnologiesComprehensive analysis of coordination mechanisms for AI safety showing racing dynamics could compress safety timelines by 2-5 years, with $500M+ government investment in AI Safety Institutes achie...Quality: 91/100
Other
AI ControlResearch AreaAI ControlAI Control is a defensive safety approach that maintains control over potentially misaligned AI through monitoring, containment, and redundancy, offering 40-60% catastrophic risk reduction if align...Quality: 75/100
Risks
Multipolar Trap (AI Development)RiskMultipolar Trap (AI Development)Analysis of coordination failures in AI development using game theory, documenting how competitive dynamics between nations (US $109B vs China $9.3B investment in 2024 per Stanford HAI 2025) and la...Quality: 91/100
Key Debates
AI Governance and PolicyCruxAI Governance and PolicyComprehensive analysis of AI governance mechanisms estimating 30-50% probability of meaningful regulation by 2027 and 5-25% x-risk reduction potential through coordinated international approaches. ...Quality: 66/100Open vs Closed Source AICruxOpen vs Closed Source AIComprehensive analysis of open vs closed source AI debate, documenting that open model performance gap narrowed from 8% to 1.7% in 2024, with 1.2B+ Llama downloads by April 2025 and DeepSeek R1 dem...Quality: 60/100
Analysis
US Government Authority Over Commercial AI InfrastructureAnalysisUS Government Authority Over Commercial AI InfrastructureSurveys US legal authority (DPA, IEEPA, CLOUD Act, FISA 702) over $700B+ in commercial AI infrastructure concentrated in 5-6 companies, concluding the government has extensive but not unlimited pow...Quality: 64/100AI Safety Multi-Actor Strategic LandscapeAnalysisAI Safety Multi-Actor Strategic LandscapeAnalyzes AI risk through the lens of which actors develop TAI, finding actor identity may account for 40-60% of total risk variance, with detailed quantitative data on US-China capability convergen...Quality: 79/100
Historical
Mainstream EraHistoricalMainstream EraComprehensive timeline of AI safety's transition from niche to mainstream (2020-present), documenting ChatGPT's unprecedented growth (100M users in 2 months), the OpenAI governance crisis, and firs...Quality: 42/100Anthropic-Pentagon Standoff (2026)EventAnthropic-Pentagon Standoff (2026)Comprehensive analysis of the February 2026 confrontation between Anthropic and the US government. Triggered when Claude AI was used in the January 2026 Venezuela raid via Palantir, Anthropic refus...Quality: 70/100