Skip to content

Metaforecast

📋Page Status
Page Type:ResponseStyle Guide →Intervention/response page
Quality:35 (Draft)⚠️
Importance:15 (Peripheral)
Last edited:2026-01-29 (3 days ago)
Words:1.6k
Structure:
📊 13📈 0🔗 4📚 1015%Score: 13/15
LLM Summary:Metaforecast is a forecast aggregation platform combining 2,100+ questions from 10+ sources (Metaculus, Manifold, Polymarket, etc.) with daily updates via automated scraping. Created by QURI, it provides unified search and GraphQL API access but lacks historical data and is limited to passive aggregation rather than enabling new forecasting capabilities.
Issues (1):
  • QualityRated 35 but structure suggests 87 (underrated by 52 points)
DimensionAssessmentEvidence
CoverageComprehensive2,100+ active questions from 10+ platforms
Data FreshnessDailyAutomated scraping pipeline
AccessibilityHighFree web interface, GraphQL API
IntegrationActiveTwitter bot, Discord bot (Fletcher), GlobalGuessing
Open SourceFullyGitHub repository, part of Squiggle monorepo
MaintenanceActiveOngoing updates, platform additions
AttributeDetails
NameMetaforecast
OrganizationQURI (Quantified Uncertainty Research Institute)
CreatorNuño Sempere (with help from Ozzie Gooen)
Launched2021
Websitemetaforecast.org
GitHubgithub.com/quantified-uncertainty/metaforecast
LicenseOpen source (part of Squiggle monorepo)
APIGraphQL endpoint for programmatic access

Metaforecast aggregates forecasts from multiple prediction platforms into a single searchable interface, solving the platform fragmentation problem that reduces forecasting’s utility as a public good. While individual platforms like Metaculus, Manifold, and Polymarket each host valuable forecasts, researchers and decision-makers must check multiple sites to find relevant predictions. Metaforecast eliminates this friction by combining data from 10+ platforms with unified search.

The project was initiated by Nuño Sempere, with help from Ozzie Gooen, at QURI. Data is fetched daily via automated scraping, showing immediate forecasts without historical time-series data. This design is optimized for quick lookups (“What’s the current probability of X?”) rather than trend analysis.

Metaforecast treats forecasting as a public good that becomes more valuable with aggregation. The platform is deliberately simple: search for a question, see current probabilities from multiple sources, compare platforms side-by-side. No user accounts, no social features, no complexity—just forecasts.

Metaforecast currently indexes approximately 2,100 active forecasting questions across these platforms:

PlatformTypeQuestionsNotes
MetaculusReputation-based≈1,200 (55% of total)Largest source; research-focused, community prediction aggregation
ManifoldPlay money marketVariesResearch-focused, no profit motive, uses Mana currency
PolymarketReal money (crypto)VariesRose to prominence in 2024 US election, real financial stakes
Good Judgment OpenSuperforecaster platform≈100-200Connected to Good Judgment Project, expert forecasters
PredictItPolitical market≈50-100US political focus, regulated real-money trading
KalshiCFTC-regulated market≈100-200Regulatory compliance focus, legal real-money markets
Insight PredictionPrediction marketVariesAdditional market source
INFERPolicy forecastingVariesGovernment-adjacent forecasting

Additionally, Metaforecast provides access to 17,000+ public models from Guesstimate, Ozzie Gooen’s earlier Monte Carlo spreadsheet tool.

PlatformIncentive StructureTypical User Base
MetaculusReputation points, tournament prizesAI researchers, academics, rationalists
ManifoldPlay money (Mana)EA/rationalist community, hobbyists
PolymarketReal money (cryptocurrency)Traders, serious forecasters, arbitrageurs
Good JudgmentReputation, selective admissionProfessional superforecasters
KalshiReal money (USD), CFTC-regulatedFinance professionals, serious traders
ComponentDescription
ScrapingDaily automated fetching from each platform’s API or web interface
StorageCentralized database with normalized question format
SearchElasticsearch-powered full-text search
APIGraphQL endpoint for programmatic access
UISimple web interface with platform comparison

Metaforecast fetches data daily, ensuring forecasts are current. However, the system is optimized for point-in-time forecasts rather than historical trend analysis:

  • Shows: Current probability estimates from each platform
  • Does not show: Historical time-series or forecast evolution over time

This design choice reduces storage requirements and simplifies the interface at the cost of trend analysis capabilities.

Search across all platforms simultaneously:

Query: "AGI by 2030"
Results: Shows all matching questions from Metaculus, Manifold, Polymarket, etc.

See how different sources estimate the same event:

QuestionMetaculusManifoldPolymarket
AGI by 203045%60%
Nuclear war by 20509%12%

This comparison helps identify consensus vs. divergence in forecasting communities.

Programmatic access for integrations:

query {
questions(limit: 10, query: "AI capabilities") {
title
platform
probability
url
}
}

The API enables:

  • Custom analysis and visualization
  • Integration with research workflows
  • Automated monitoring of specific questions

The GitHub repository is part of QURI’s Squiggle monorepo, allowing community contributions and transparency in the scraping methodology.

Metaforecast has been integrated with several external services:

ServiceDescriptionStatus
Twitter BotPosts notable forecastsActive
FletcherDiscord bot for forecast lookupsActive
GlobalGuessingForecasting community platformActive
ElicitAI research assistantPreviously integrated

These integrations make forecast data accessible in contexts where users already work.

Researchers use Metaforecast to:

  • Find consensus forecasts on emerging technologies
  • Compare expert vs. market-based predictions
  • Track how different communities view the same question
  • Validate assumptions in models with community forecasts

Organizations reference Metaforecast for:

  • Strategic planning timeline assumptions
  • Risk assessment probability inputs
  • Validation of internal forecasts against external views

Researchers studying forecasting accuracy use Metaforecast to:

  • Compare platform performance
  • Identify systematic biases
  • Analyze calibration across question types

During the 2024 US presidential election, Polymarket (one of Metaforecast’s sources) demonstrated the value of prediction market aggregation. Polymarket strongly favored Trump’s victory even as traditional polls showed a closer race. The market’s prediction proved correct, with reports of approximately $10 million in bets from individual traders helping shape the odds.

Metaforecast allowed researchers to compare Polymarket’s market-based odds against Metaculus’s reputation-based aggregation and other sources, providing multiple perspectives on the same event.

AspectMetaforecastIndividual Platform
Coverage10+ platforms, 2,100+ questionsSingle platform, typically 100-1,000 questions
SearchCross-platform unified searchPlatform-specific search
Historical DataNone (current forecasts only)Often available
CommunityRead-only aggregationActive participation, social features
IncentivesNone (passive aggregation)Reputation points, money, social status
Effort RequiredSingle searchMust check multiple sites

Metaforecast gains:

  • Convenience: Single search across all platforms
  • Comparison: See multiple sources side-by-side
  • Completeness: Less likely to miss relevant forecasts

Individual platforms gain:

  • Historical data: Track forecast evolution
  • Community context: Discussion, reasoning transparency
  • Participation: Ability to contribute forecasts
StrengthEvidence
Solves fragmentationAggregates 10+ platforms into single interface
Daily updatesFresh data from automated scraping
Free and openNo paywall, open-source code
API accessEnables custom integrations and analysis
Simple interfaceNo learning curve, immediate utility
Broad coverage2,100+ active questions plus 17,000+ Guesstimate models
LimitationImpact
No historical dataCannot track forecast evolution or analyze updating patterns
Scraping-dependentBreaks if source platforms change their structure
Heterogeneous questionsDifferent platforms use different operationalizations for similar events
No participationPassive aggregation; users cannot contribute forecasts
Limited metadataReasoning, comments, and community context not aggregated
Maintenance burdenEach new platform requires custom scraper implementation

Metaforecast complements QURI’s other tools:

ToolPurposeRelationship to Metaforecast
SquiggleProbabilistic modelingMetaforecast provides probability inputs for Squiggle models
Squiggle HubModel sharing platformCan link to relevant Metaforecast questions as external validation
SquiggleAILLM model generationCould use Metaforecast data to ground AI-generated probability estimates
GuesstimateMonte Carlo spreadsheetsMetaforecast hosts 17,000+ Guesstimate models

As a QURI project, Metaforecast is funded through QURI’s grants:

SourceAmountPeriod
Survival and Flourishing Fund$150K+ to QURI2019-2022
Future Fund$100K to QURI2022
Long-Term Future FundOngoing to QURI2023-present

Metaforecast represents a small portion of QURI’s overall budget but provides a valuable public good for the forecasting community.

Potential enhancements based on community feedback:

EnhancementBenefitChallenge
Historical dataTrend analysis, forecast trackingStorage costs, backfill complexity
Reasoning aggregationExpose why forecasters believe what they doScraping complexity, heterogeneous formats
Custom question creationUser-defined aggregationsModeration, quality control
Alert systemNotify when specific forecasts updateUser accounts, notification infrastructure
Calibration trackingShow platform accuracy recordsRequires resolution data, complex analysis