Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Citation·page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn28

EA and Longtermist Wins and Losses - Footnote 28

Verdictcontradicted75%
1 check · 4/3/2026

unsupported: The claim that the Against Malaria Foundation has protected over 667 million people is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that CEA reports strong engagement growth in 2025 after post-FTX declines is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that hundreds of millions of dollars have flowed to existential risk research is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that AI safety work has gained mainstream policy traction is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that California has signed bills directly regulating AI risk is not supported by the source.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
contradicted75%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

Noteunsupported: The claim that the Against Malaria Foundation has protected over 667 million people is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that CEA reports strong engagement growth in 2025 after post-FTX declines is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that hundreds of millions of dollars have flowed to existential risk research is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that AI safety work has gained mainstream policy traction is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that California has signed bills directly regulating AI risk is not supported by the source.

Case № page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn28Filed 4/3/2026Confidence 75%
Source Check: EA and Longtermist Wins and Losses - Footnote 28 | Longterm Wiki