Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Citation·page:good-judgment:fn45

Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 45

Verdictcontradicted40%
1 check · 4/3/2026

unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts in The Economist. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters correctly predicting global economic growth at 3%, China's growth at 5%, and that Putin would not be ousted from power. misleading paraphrase: The source states that Superforecasters outperformed Financial Times readers on forecasts for 2023 events, but it does not specify that there were 8,500 participants from Financial Times. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
contradicted40%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

Noteunsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts in The Economist. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters correctly predicting global economic growth at 3%, China's growth at 5%, and that Putin would not be ousted from power. misleading paraphrase: The source states that Superforecasters outperformed Financial Times readers on forecasts for 2023 events, but it does not specify that there were 8,500 participants from Financial Times. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025.

Case № page:good-judgment:fn45Filed 4/3/2026Confidence 40%