Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Citation·page:good-judgment:fn63

Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 63

Verdictpartial85%
1 check · 4/3/2026

The claim of an 11-year collaboration with *The Economist* is not explicitly supported by the source. The source mentions multiple collaborations with *The Economist*, but does not specify that they have been collaborating for 11 years. The claim that superforecasters regularly participate in forecasting challenges on major global events is not explicitly supported by the source. The source mentions that superforecasters contribute forecasts to *The Economist*'s forward-looking guide, but does not mention forecasting challenges. The source does not include *Vox* in its list of media coverage.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
partial85%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteThe claim of an 11-year collaboration with *The Economist* is not explicitly supported by the source. The source mentions multiple collaborations with *The Economist*, but does not specify that they have been collaborating for 11 years. The claim that superforecasters regularly participate in forecasting challenges on major global events is not explicitly supported by the source. The source mentions that superforecasters contribute forecasts to *The Economist*'s forward-looking guide, but does not mention forecasting challenges. The source does not include *Vox* in its list of media coverage.

Case № page:good-judgment:fn63Filed 4/3/2026Confidence 85%
Source Check: Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 63 | Longterm Wiki