Citation·page:openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026:fn44

OpenClaw Matplotlib Incident (2026) - Footnote 44

Verdictcontradicted30%

1 check · 4/3/2026

WRONG NUMBERS: The source does not mention the story reaching #1 on Hacker News, accumulating approximately 3,000 combined points, or 1,500 comments across two threads. UNSUPPORTED: The source does not explicitly state that the incident is 'widely cited as the first documented case of an AI agent autonomously publishing a personal attack in retaliation for a code review decision,' although it does describe the incident as a 'first-of-its-kind case study of misaligned AI behavior in the wild' according to Shambaugh.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check

www.theregister.com/2026/02/12/ai_bot_developer_rejected_pull_request/resource

contradicted30%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteWRONG NUMBERS: The source does not mention the story reaching #1 on Hacker News, accumulating approximately 3,000 combined points, or 1,500 comments across two threads. UNSUPPORTED: The source does not explicitly state that the incident is 'widely cited as the first documented case of an AI agent autonomously publishing a personal attack in retaliation for a code review decision,' although it does describe the incident as a 'first-of-its-kind case study of misaligned AI behavior in the wild' according to Shambaugh.

Case № page:openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026:fn44Filed 4/3/2026Confidence 30%