Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Citation·page:samotsvety:fn16

Samotsvety - Footnote 16

Verdictcontradicted50%
1 check · 4/3/2026

WRONG NUMBERS: The claim includes timelines for transformative AI (28% by 2030, 60% by 2050, 89% by 2100), but the source only mentions 81% chance of Transformative AI (TAI) by 2100. WRONG NUMBERS: The claim states 89% by 2100, but the source states 81% by 2100. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that the group released influential AI risk forecasts throughout 2023-2024, but the source is dated September 9, 2022, and does not mention any activities in 2023-2024. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that their work has been incorporated into literature reviews by Epoch AI and cited in discussions about AI safety policy, but the source does not mention this.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
contradicted50%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteWRONG NUMBERS: The claim includes timelines for transformative AI (28% by 2030, 60% by 2050, 89% by 2100), but the source only mentions 81% chance of Transformative AI (TAI) by 2100. WRONG NUMBERS: The claim states 89% by 2100, but the source states 81% by 2100. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that the group released influential AI risk forecasts throughout 2023-2024, but the source is dated September 9, 2022, and does not mention any activities in 2023-2024. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that their work has been incorporated into literature reviews by Epoch AI and cited in discussions about AI safety policy, but the source does not mention this.

Case № page:samotsvety:fn16Filed 4/3/2026Confidence 50%