Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki
Index
Fact·f_1BWsBJuBcg·Fact

Center for AI Safety (CAIS) — Description: The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based nonprofit focused on reducing societal-scale risks from AI through technical safety research, field-building, and public communication. Founded by Dan Hendrycks and Oliver Zhang. Known for the MMLU benchmark, representation engineering, and the May 2023 "Statement on AI Risk" signed by 350+ AI leaders.

Verdictpartial85%
1 check · 9/21/2026

1 → partial

Our claim

entire record
Subject
Center for AI Safety (CAIS)
Property
Description
Value
The Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based nonprofit focused on reducing societal-scale risks from AI through technical safety research, field-building, and public communication. Founded by Dan Hendrycks and Oliver Zhang. Known for the MMLU benchmark, representation… expandThe Center for AI Safety (CAIS) is a San Francisco-based nonprofit focused on reducing societal-scale risks from AI through technical safety research, field-building, and public communication. Founded by Dan Hendrycks and Oliver Zhang. Known for the MMLU benchmark, representation engineering, and the May 2023 "Statement on AI Risk" signed by 350+ AI leaders.
As Of
2025

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
partial85%primaryHaiku 4.5 · 9/21/2026

NoteThe claim makes four main assertions: (1) San Francisco-based nonprofit—unverifiable from source (location not stated); (2) focused on reducing societal-scale risks through technical safety research, field-building, and public communication—CONFIRMED (source says 'research, field-building, and advocacy'); (3) Founded by Dan Hendrycks and Oliver Zhang—CONFIRMED (both listed in Leadership); (4) Known for MMLU benchmark, representation engineering, and May 2023 'Statement on AI Risk' signed by 350+ leaders—CONTRADICTED on the statement signature count. The source states the 'Global Statement on AI Risk' was signed by '600 leading AI researchers and public figures,' not 350+. The MMLU benchmark and representation engineering are not mentioned in the source, making those claims unverifiable. The temporal qualifier 'as of 2025' cannot be verified from the source date. Overall: location unverifiable, core mission confirmed, founders confirmed, but the AI Risk statement signature count is contradicted (600 vs. 350+), and two key accomplishments are unverifiable.

Case № f_1BWsBJuBcgFiled 9/21/2026Confidence 85%
Source Check: Description | Longterm Wiki