AI Policy Institute — polling-finding: Three out of four voters skeptical of 'race China' arguments for AI deregulation; 76% prefer candidates supporting AI regulation
The source URL points to a TIME article about AI, China, and American voters' polling, but the provided source text is only the Wayback Machine interface metadata (timestamps, collection info, etc.) with no actual article content. The excerpt does not contain any polling data, statistics about voter skepticism, or the specific 76% figure mentioned in the claim. Without access to the actual article text, the claim cannot be verified against the source material.
Our claim
entire record- Subject
- AI Policy Institute
- Value
- Three out of four voters skeptical of 'race China' arguments for AI deregulation; 76% prefer candidates supporting AI regulation
- As Of
- 2024
Source evidence
1 src · 2 checksNoteThe source URL points to a TIME article about AI, China, and American voters' polling, but the provided source text is only the Wayback Machine interface metadata (timestamps, collection info, etc.) with no actual article content. The excerpt does not contain any polling data, statistics about voter skepticism, or the specific 76% figure mentioned in the claim. Without access to the actual article text, the claim cannot be verified against the source material.
NoteThe claim states '76% prefer candidates supporting AI regulation,' but the source provides different metrics: (1) 75% of both Democrats and Republicans prefer a careful controlled approach (not 76%), and (2) 50% support using U.S. advantage for safety restrictions vs. 23% wanting to race China. The source does confirm voters are 'skeptical of the argument that the U.S. should race ahead...unconstrained by domestic regulations, in an effort to compete with China,' which aligns with the first part of the claim. However, the specific 76% figure for 'candidates supporting AI regulation' is not directly stated in the source. The 75% figure is close but measures preference for approach, not candidate support specifically.