GovAI — publication: Risk Thresholds for Frontier AI — proposes framework for when frontier AI capabilities warrant regulatory intervention
The source URL points to arXiv:2406.14713, which matches the arXiv ID provided in the claim's additional context. However, the source text shows only an error message indicating the document conversion failed and the content is inaccessible. Without access to the actual paper content, it is impossible to verify whether it is titled 'Risk Thresholds for Frontier AI', whether it proposes a framework for regulatory intervention, or whether it is a GovAI publication. The claim cannot be confirmed or contradicted based on unreadable source material.
Our claim
entire record- Subject
- GovAI
- Value
- Risk Thresholds for Frontier AI — proposes framework for when frontier AI capabilities warrant regulatory intervention
- As Of
- 2024
- Notes
- arXiv:2406.14713 (June 2024). Verified correct — sourcing flagged wrong arXiv ID (2311.14368 was a different paper).
Source evidence
2 src · 2 checksNoteThe claim states that GovAI published 'Risk Thresholds for Frontier AI' proposing a framework for regulatory intervention in frontier AI. However, the source URL (arXiv:2311.14368) points to a completely unrelated physics paper about fractional Chern insulators in graphene. The paper has nothing to do with GovAI, AI governance, risk thresholds, or regulatory frameworks. This is a clear mismatch between the claimed publication and the actual content at the provided source URL, constituting a direct contradiction.
NoteThe source URL points to arXiv:2406.14713, which matches the arXiv ID provided in the claim's additional context. However, the source text shows only an error message indicating the document conversion failed and the content is inaccessible. Without access to the actual paper content, it is impossible to verify whether it is titled 'Risk Thresholds for Frontier AI', whether it proposes a framework for regulatory intervention, or whether it is a GovAI publication. The claim cannot be confirmed or contradicted based on unreadable source material.