Protect Democracy — litigation-detail: Pallek v. Rollins (1:25-cv-01650, D.D.C., Judge Jia M. Cobb) — Plaintiffs include SNAP recipients, MAZON, EPIC. Counsel: National Student Legal Defense Network, Protect Democracy, National Center for Law and Economic Justice. USDA demanded SSNs and addresses of all SNAP recipients since Jan 2020. Plaintiffs filed TRO (July 17, 2025), motion for summary judgment (Aug 29, 2025).
Protect Democracy record
The source confirms most claim details: case number, judge name, plaintiffs (SNAP recipients, MAZON, EPIC), counsel organizations, and the USDA demand for SSNs and addresses since Jan 2020. However, the source does NOT mention a motion for summary judgment filed on Aug 29, 2025. The source only documents a Motion for TRO filed May 27, 2025. The claim's reference to 'as of 2025-09' suggests September 2025 status, but the source text provided does not include any documents or references dated after June 2025 (the TRO hearing date). The summary judgment motion is unverifiable from this source.
Our claim
entire record- Subject
- Protect Democracy
- Value
Pallek v. Rollins (1:25-cv-01650, D.D.C., Judge Jia M. Cobb) — Plaintiffs include SNAP recipients, MAZON, EPIC. Counsel: National Student Legal Defense Network, Protect Democracy, National Center for Law and Economic Justice. USDA demanded SSNs and addresses of all SNAP recipient… expand
Pallek v. Rollins (1:25-cv-01650, D.D.C., Judge Jia M. Cobb) — Plaintiffs include SNAP recipients, MAZON, EPIC. Counsel: National Student Legal Defense Network, Protect Democracy, National Center for Law and Economic Justice. USDA demanded SSNs and addresses of all SNAP recipients since Jan 2020. Plaintiffs filed TRO (July 17, 2025), motion for summary judgment (Aug 29, 2025).- As Of
- September 2025
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkNoteThe source confirms most claim details: case number, judge name, plaintiffs (SNAP recipients, MAZON, EPIC), counsel organizations, and the USDA demand for SSNs and addresses since Jan 2020. However, the source does NOT mention a motion for summary judgment filed on Aug 29, 2025. The source only documents a Motion for TRO filed May 27, 2025. The claim's reference to 'as of 2025-09' suggests September 2025 status, but the source text provided does not include any documents or references dated after June 2025 (the TRO hearing date). The summary judgment motion is unverifiable from this source.