Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki
Index
Fact·f_fYQbYvmmnA·Fact

Coefficient Giving — Description: 68% of technical AI safety grants went to evaluations/benchmarking (2024)

Verdictconfirmed95%
3 checks · 1 src · 9/21/2026

1 → confirmed; stale (excluded): 1 → partial, 1 → confirmed

Our claim

entire record
Subject
Coefficient Giving
Property
Description
Value
68% of technical AI safety grants went to evaluations/benchmarking (2024)
Notes
68% of $28M recorded technical AI safety grants

Source evidence

1 src · 3 checks
confirmed95%primaryHaiku 4.5 · 9/21/2026

NoteThe claim states '68% of technical AI safety grants went to evaluations/benchmarking (2024)' with context '$28M recorded technical AI safety grants.' The source directly confirms both the $28M total and the 68% figure for evaluations/benchmarking in 2024. The source explicitly states this in the TL;DR section and reinforces it in Key Finding (1). The 68% figure is presented as a precise statistic, and 2/3 (66.7%) is mathematically equivalent within rounding. All elements of the claim are confirmed by the source.

partial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026

NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim subject is identified only as 'fact/f_fYQbYvmmnA' with no actual entity name provided, making it impossible to verify if the source matches. Without knowing what entity the claim is actually about, I cannot confirm subject alignment per QUA-648 guidelines, which require preferring MISMATCH when in doubt.

confirmed95%primaryHaiku 3 · 3/22/2026

NoteThe source text directly confirms both key components of the claim: (1) $28M in recorded technical AI safety grants in 2024, and (2) 68% of these grants went to evaluations/benchmarking. The exact figures and percentages match the claim precisely.

Case № f_fYQbYvmmnAFiled 9/21/2026Confidence 95%