Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Fact·f_lpp_staff·Fact

Fact f_lpp_staff

Verdictpartial85%
2 checks · 1 src · 3/31/2026
⚠ Checks disagree: 1 partial, 1 unverifiable

The source text confirms the numerical breakdown (28 total = 19 core + 9 affiliates) by listing the team members. However, the claim includes temporal specificity ('as of 2026') and historical context ('grew from 6.1 FTE in 2022') that the source does not address. The source is a static team page with no date stamp visible in the excerpt, making it impossible to verify the '2026' claim or the historical growth trajectory. The core count appears to be 19, not 28 core team members as the additional context suggests—the 28 is the total including affiliates. This is a partial confirmation of the total headcount but unverifiable regarding the temporal claim and historical growth data.

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 2 checks
partial85%primaryHaiku 4.5 · 3/31/2026

NoteThe source text confirms the numerical breakdown (28 total = 19 core + 9 affiliates) by listing the team members. However, the claim includes temporal specificity ('as of 2026') and historical context ('grew from 6.1 FTE in 2022') that the source does not address. The source is a static team page with no date stamp visible in the excerpt, making it impossible to verify the '2026' claim or the historical growth trajectory. The core count appears to be 19, not 28 core team members as the additional context suggests—the 28 is the total including affiliates. This is a partial confirmation of the total headcount but unverifiable regarding the temporal claim and historical growth data.

unverifiable95%primaryHaiku 3 · 3/25/2026

NoteThe claim is about the Legal Priorities Project's employee count, but the source text is from the Institute for Law & AI (law-ai.org), which is a different organization. While the source does show 28 core team members + 9 affiliates (matching the additional context provided), this is data about the wrong organization. The claim cannot be verified against this source because it addresses a different entity entirely.

Case № f_lpp_staffFiled 3/31/2026Confidence 85%