Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) — litigation: UAW v. U.S. Department of State (S.D.N.Y., filed Oct 16, 2025) — EFF represents UAW, CWA, AFT (with Muslim Advocates) challenging mass social media surveillance of visa holders using AI. Alleges First Amendment and APA violations. Seeks injunction and record purge.
The source text confirms all major elements of the claim: (1) the case name and parties (UAW v. U.S. Department of State), (2) the court and filing date (S.D.N.Y., October 16, 2025), (3) EFF's representation of UAW, CWA, and AFT, (4) Muslim Advocates as co-counsel, (5) the subject matter (mass social media surveillance of visa holders using AI), (6) the legal violations alleged (First Amendment and APA violations), and (7) the relief sought (stopping the surveillance program). The source does not explicitly mention 'record purge' as a requested remedy, but this is not contradicted—it may be in the complaint documents referenced. The temporal marker 'as of 2025-10' aligns with the October 16, 2025 filing date shown in the source.
Our claim
entire record- Subject
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
- Value
- UAW v. U.S. Department of State (S.D.N.Y., filed Oct 16, 2025) — EFF represents UAW, CWA, AFT (with Muslim Advocates) challenging mass social media surveillance of visa holders using AI. Alleges First Amendment and APA violations. Seeks injunction and record purge.
- As Of
- October 2025
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkNoteThe source text confirms all major elements of the claim: (1) the case name and parties (UAW v. U.S. Department of State), (2) the court and filing date (S.D.N.Y., October 16, 2025), (3) EFF's representation of UAW, CWA, and AFT, (4) Muslim Advocates as co-counsel, (5) the subject matter (mass social media surveillance of visa holders using AI), (6) the legal violations alleged (First Amendment and APA violations), and (7) the relief sought (stopping the surveillance program). The source does not explicitly mention 'record purge' as a requested remedy, but this is not contradicted—it may be in the complaint documents referenced. The temporal marker 'as of 2025-10' aligns with the October 16, 2025 filing date shown in the source.