Index
Grant: The Good Food Institute — General Support (Coefficient Giving → The Good Food Institute)
Verdictconfirmed95%
2 checks · 1 src · 4/9/2026⚠ Checks disagree: 1 confirmed, 1 unverifiable
Deterministic match: grantee, amount, date matched in source snapshot (2714 rows)
Our claim
entire record- Grantee
- The Good Food Institute
- Name
- The Good Food Institute — General Support
- Amount
- $1,000,000
- Currency
- USD
- Date
- September 2016
- Notes
[Alternatives to Animal Products] Published: October 2016 The Open Philanthropy Project recommended a grant of $1,000,000 to The Good Food Institute for general support. The Good Food Institute plans to use this grant to expand its work promoting alternatives to animal products. … expand
[Alternatives to Animal Products] Published: October 2016 The Open Philanthropy Project recommended a grant of $1,000,000 to The Good Food Institute for general support. The Good Food Institute plans to use this grant to expand its work promoting alternatives to animal products. It may also hire additional staff and create an operating reserve. Sources Document Source The Good Food Institute, Corporate Engagement Proposal Source The Good Food Institute, Innovation Proposal Source The Good Food Institute, Science and Technology Proposal Source
Source evidence
1 src · 2 checksconfirmed95%deterministic-row-match · 4/9/2026
- Name
- The Good Food Institute — General Support
- Grantee
- The Good Food Institute
- Focus Area
- Alternatives to Animal Products
- Amount
- $1,000,000.00
- Date
- September 2016
- Description
- Pu
NoteDeterministic match: grantee, amount, date matched in source snapshot (2714 rows)
unverifiable95%Haiku 4.5 · 3/25/2026
NoteThe source text provided is a general informational page about Coefficient Giving's funds and approach. While it confirms that Coefficient Giving is a philanthropic funder, it does not contain any specific data about individual grants, grantees, amounts, or dates. The record claims a specific $1,000,000 grant to The Good Food Institute in September 2016, but this information is not present in the source text. Without the source text containing the specific grant details, the record cannot be verified or contradicted based on this source.
Case № fFcokowGfbFiled 4/9/2026Confidence 95%