Stakeholder: Civil society coalition (45 organizations) (unknown)
The record claims a specific stakeholder: 'Civil society coalition (45 organizations)'. While the source text discusses civil society organizations' involvement and criticisms of the AIDA, it does not mention a coalition of exactly 45 organizations. The source references individual organizations and groups that submitted briefs, but does not aggregate them into a named coalition with a specific member count. The number '45' and the designation 'civil society coalition' cannot be verified from this source text.
Our claim
entire record- Stakeholder
- Civil society coalition (45 organizations)
- Position
- oppose
- Importance
- high
- Reason
- Coalition of 45 civil society organizations, experts, and academics called for AIDA to be removed from Bill C-27 and considered separately; argued requirements were vague and insufficient
- Context
- September 2023 letter argued shoehorning AI regulation into a privacy bill prevented adequate scrutiny,Concerned about ISED's dual role as economic development body and AI regulator,Criticized vague definitions of 'high-impact' AI systems and weak enforcement mechanisms
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkNoteThe record claims a specific stakeholder: 'Civil society coalition (45 organizations)'. While the source text discusses civil society organizations' involvement and criticisms of the AIDA, it does not mention a coalition of exactly 45 organizations. The source references individual organizations and groups that submitted briefs, but does not aggregate them into a named coalition with a specific member count. The number '45' and the designation 'civil society coalition' cannot be verified from this source text.