Stakeholder: R Street Institute coalition (unknown)
The source text explicitly confirms that R Street Institute is involved in this coalition effort through Adam Thierer's signature as 'Senior Fellow, R Street Institute'. The record identifies 'R Street Institute coalition' as a stakeholder, which is confirmed by the source showing R Street Institute (via Thierer) as a participating organization in the coalition letter. The coalition itself is real and documented in the source. The 'unknown' designation for coalition composition is reasonable given the source lists individual signatories rather than formally naming the coalition as an entity.
Our claim
entire record- Stakeholder
- R Street Institute
- Stakeholder
- R Street Institute coalition
- Position
- oppose
- Importance
- medium
- Reason
- Coalition of free-market groups argued TRAIGA imposes restrictive regulations and burdensome compliance costs that risk stifling innovation despite its light-touch framing
- Context
- Joined by Americans for Tax Reform and other anti-regulation organizations,Argued compliance mandates particularly hurt small businesses lacking resources of larger tech firms,Opposed any state-level AI regulation, not just TRAIGA specifically
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkNoteThe source text explicitly confirms that R Street Institute is involved in this coalition effort through Adam Thierer's signature as 'Senior Fellow, R Street Institute'. The record identifies 'R Street Institute coalition' as a stakeholder, which is confirmed by the source showing R Street Institute (via Thierer) as a participating organization in the coalition letter. The coalition itself is real and documented in the source. The 'unknown' designation for coalition composition is reasonable given the source lists individual signatories rather than formally naming the coalition as an entity.