Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Policy Stakeholder·u86d7lkyev·Record

Stakeholder: Civil society coalition (45 organizations) (unknown)

Verdictunverifiable95%
1 check · 4/9/2026

The record claims a 'Civil society coalition (45 organizations)' but the source text does not mention any coalition of exactly 45 civil society organizations. While the source discusses civil society organizations' involvement and criticisms of the AIDA, it does not quantify them as a specific 45-member coalition. The specific number '45' cannot be verified from this source.

Our claim

entire record
Stakeholder
Civil society coalition (45 organizations)
Position
oppose
Importance
high
Reason
Coalition of 45 civil society organizations, experts, and academics called for AIDA to be removed from Bill C-27 and considered separately; argued requirements were vague and insufficient
Context
September 2023 letter argued shoehorning AI regulation into a privacy bill prevented adequate scrutiny,Concerned about ISED's dual role as economic development body and AI regulator,Criticized vague definitions of 'high-impact' AI systems and weak enforcement mechanisms

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
unverifiable95%Haiku 4.5 · 4/9/2026

NoteThe record claims a 'Civil society coalition (45 organizations)' but the source text does not mention any coalition of exactly 45 civil society organizations. While the source discusses civil society organizations' involvement and criticisms of the AIDA, it does not quantify them as a specific 45-member coalition. The specific number '45' cannot be verified from this source.

Case № u86d7lkyevFiled 4/9/2026Confidence 95%