AI-Assisted Deliberation Platforms
deliberationapproachPath: /knowledge-base/responses/deliberation/
E100Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "deliberation",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/deliberation/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/deliberation.mdx",
"title": "AI-Assisted Deliberation Platforms",
"quality": 63,
"readerImportance": 21.5,
"researchImportance": 76.5,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Comprehensive analysis of AI-assisted deliberation platforms showing 15-35% opinion change rates, with Taiwan's vTaiwan achieving 80% policy implementation across 26 issues and Anthropic's Constitutional AI incorporating input from 1,094 participants. Evidence demonstrates medium-high tractability but low-medium manipulation resistance, with platforms deployed in 35+ countries and engaging millions (EU: 5M+ visitors).",
"description": "This response uses AI to facilitate large-scale democratic deliberation on AI governance and policy. Evidence shows 15-35% opinion change rates among participants, with Taiwan's vTaiwan achieving 80% policy implementation from 26 issues. The EU's Conference on the Future of Europe engaged 5+ million visitors, while Anthropic's Constitutional AI experiment incorporated input from 1,094 participants into Claude's training, demonstrating feasibility at scale.",
"ratings": {
"novelty": 4.2,
"rigor": 6.8,
"actionability": 5.5,
"completeness": 7.1
},
"category": "responses",
"subcategory": "epistemic-approaches",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance",
"epistemics"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 3471,
"tableCount": 8,
"diagramCount": 0,
"internalLinks": 76,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.15,
"sectionCount": 35,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 11
},
"suggestedQuality": 73,
"updateFrequency": 45,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 3471,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 67,
"backlinkCount": 1,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 50,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources",
"conceptual-content"
]
},
"entityType": "approach",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 18,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "epistemic-infrastructure",
"title": "AI-Era Epistemic Infrastructure",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/epistemic-infrastructure/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "epistemic-security",
"title": "AI-Era Epistemic Security",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/epistemic-security/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "failed-stalled-proposals",
"title": "Failed and Stalled AI Policy Proposals",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/failed-stalled-proposals/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "nist-ai-rmf",
"title": "NIST AI Risk Management Framework",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/nist-ai-rmf/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "scalable-oversight",
"title": "Scalable Oversight",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/scalable-oversight/",
"similarity": 18
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 6,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 14,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 28,
"externalLinks": 17,
"footnotes": 10,
"references": 10
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 8,
"diagrams": 0,
"internalLinks": 76,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 39,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "amber",
"diagrams": "red",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:6.8 A:5.5 C:7.1"
},
"readerRank": 513,
"researchRank": 111,
"recommendedScore": 158.61
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (1)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| epistemic-tools-approaches-overview | Approaches (Overview) | concept | — |