Longterm Wiki

AI-Driven Institutional Decision Capture

institutional-captureriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/institutional-capture/
E166Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page2 backlinksQuality: 73Updated: 2026-03-13
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "institutional-capture",
  "numericId": null,
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/institutional-capture/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/institutional-capture.mdx",
  "title": "AI-Driven Institutional Decision Capture",
  "quality": 73,
  "readerImportance": 38.5,
  "researchImportance": 62.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "tractability": null,
  "neglectedness": null,
  "uncertainty": null,
  "causalLevel": "outcome",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "llmSummary": "Comprehensive analysis of how AI systems could capture institutional decision-making across healthcare, criminal justice, hiring, and governance through systematic biases. Documents 85% racial bias in resume screening, 3.46x healthcare referral disparities, and 77% higher risk scores for Black defendants, with projected systemic capture by 2030-2040 as automation bias and organizational dependencies entrench algorithmic control while preserving illusion of human oversight.",
  "description": "AI systems could systematically bias institutional decisions in healthcare, criminal justice, hiring, and governance. Evidence shows 85% racial bias in resume screening LLMs, 3.46x disparity in healthcare algorithm referrals for Black patients, and 77% higher risk scores for Black defendants. By 2035, distributed AI adoption could create invisible societal steering with limited democratic recourse.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 5.8,
    "rigor": 7.2,
    "actionability": 6.1,
    "completeness": 7.5
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "epistemic",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 7726,
    "tableCount": 4,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 41,
    "externalLinks": 0,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.2,
    "sectionCount": 39,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 12
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 80,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 7726,
  "unconvertedLinks": [],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
  "convertedLinkCount": 39,
  "backlinkCount": 2,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 45,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "few-external-sources",
      "high-rigor"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 21,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "authoritarian-tools-diffusion",
        "title": "Authoritarian Tools Diffusion Model",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/authoritarian-tools-diffusion/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "agentic-ai",
        "title": "Agentic AI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/agentic-ai/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "scientific-research",
        "title": "Scientific Research Capabilities",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/scientific-research/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "why-alignment-hard",
        "title": "Why Alignment Might Be Hard",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/debates/why-alignment-hard/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "whistleblower-dynamics",
        "title": "Whistleblower Dynamics Model",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/whistleblower-dynamics/",
        "similarity": 20
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 5,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 31,
      "diagrams": 3,
      "internalLinks": 62,
      "externalLinks": 39,
      "footnotes": 23,
      "references": 23
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 4,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 41,
      "externalLinks": 0,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 23,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "llmSummary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "amber",
      "internalLinks": "amber",
      "externalLinks": "red",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:5.8 R:7.2 A:6.1 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 390,
  "researchRank": 205,
  "recommendedScore": 187.11
}
External Links

No external links

Backlinks (2)
idtitletyperelationship
epistemic-overviewEpistemic Risks (Overview)concept
historical-revisionismHistorical Revisionismrisk
Longterm Wiki