International AI Coordination Game
international-coordination-gameanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game/
E172Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "international-coordination-game",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game.mdx",
"title": "International AI Coordination Game",
"quality": 59,
"readerImportance": 36,
"researchImportance": 74.5,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Game-theoretic analysis demonstrating that US-China AI coordination defaults to mutual defection (racing) because defection dominates when cooperation probability falls below 50%, with current estimates at 60-70% likelihood of continued deterioration through 2030. Key intervention leverage points identified: Track 2 diplomacy (\\$10-20M annually), verification technology development (\\$50-200M over 5 years), and middle power coordination through EU regulatory frameworks.",
"description": "Game-theoretic analysis of US-China AI coordination showing mutual defection (racing) as the stable Nash equilibrium despite Pareto-optimal cooperation being possible, with formal payoff matrices demonstrating why defection dominates when cooperation probability is below 50%. The model identifies information asymmetry, multidimensional coordination challenges, and time dynamics as key barriers to stable international AI safety agreements.",
"ratings": {
"focus": 8.5,
"novelty": 4.2,
"rigor": 6.5,
"completeness": 7,
"concreteness": 6,
"actionability": 5.5
},
"category": "models",
"subcategory": "governance-models",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 1928,
"tableCount": 11,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 42,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.02,
"sectionCount": 28,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 12
},
"suggestedQuality": 80,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 1928,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 36,
"backlinkCount": 2,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 60,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources"
]
},
"entityType": "analysis",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 18,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "intervention-timing-windows",
"title": "Intervention Timing Windows",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/intervention-timing-windows/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "multipolar-trap",
"title": "Multipolar Trap (AI Development)",
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/multipolar-trap/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "structural-risks",
"title": "AI Structural Risk Cruxes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/structural-risks/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "coordination-mechanisms",
"title": "International Coordination Mechanisms",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/coordination-mechanisms/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "governance-policy",
"title": "AI Governance and Policy",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/governance-policy/",
"similarity": 17
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 8,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 8,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 15,
"externalLinks": 10,
"footnotes": 6,
"references": 6
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 11,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 42,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 30,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "green",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:6.5 A:5.5 C:7"
},
"readerRank": 407,
"researchRank": 123,
"recommendedScore": 157.64
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (2)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| critical-uncertainties | AI Risk Critical Uncertainties Model | crux | — |
| worldview-intervention-mapping | Worldview-Intervention Mapping | analysis | — |