Longterm Wiki

International AI Coordination Game

international-coordination-gameanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game/
E172Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page2 backlinksQuality: 59Updated: 2026-03-13
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "international-coordination-game",
  "numericId": null,
  "path": "/knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/models/international-coordination-game.mdx",
  "title": "International AI Coordination Game",
  "quality": 59,
  "readerImportance": 36,
  "researchImportance": 74.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "tractability": null,
  "neglectedness": null,
  "uncertainty": null,
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "llmSummary": "Game-theoretic analysis demonstrating that US-China AI coordination defaults to mutual defection (racing) because defection dominates when cooperation probability falls below 50%, with current estimates at 60-70% likelihood of continued deterioration through 2030. Key intervention leverage points identified: Track 2 diplomacy (\\$10-20M annually), verification technology development (\\$50-200M over 5 years), and middle power coordination through EU regulatory frameworks.",
  "description": "Game-theoretic analysis of US-China AI coordination showing mutual defection (racing) as the stable Nash equilibrium despite Pareto-optimal cooperation being possible, with formal payoff matrices demonstrating why defection dominates when cooperation probability is below 50%. The model identifies information asymmetry, multidimensional coordination challenges, and time dynamics as key barriers to stable international AI safety agreements.",
  "ratings": {
    "focus": 8.5,
    "novelty": 4.2,
    "rigor": 6.5,
    "completeness": 7,
    "concreteness": 6,
    "actionability": 5.5
  },
  "category": "models",
  "subcategory": "governance-models",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 1928,
    "tableCount": 11,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 42,
    "externalLinks": 0,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.02,
    "sectionCount": 28,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 12
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 80,
  "updateFrequency": 90,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 1928,
  "unconvertedLinks": [],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
  "convertedLinkCount": 36,
  "backlinkCount": 2,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 60,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "few-external-sources"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "analysis",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 18,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "intervention-timing-windows",
        "title": "Intervention Timing Windows",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/models/intervention-timing-windows/",
        "similarity": 18
      },
      {
        "id": "multipolar-trap",
        "title": "Multipolar Trap (AI Development)",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/multipolar-trap/",
        "similarity": 18
      },
      {
        "id": "structural-risks",
        "title": "AI Structural Risk Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/structural-risks/",
        "similarity": 17
      },
      {
        "id": "coordination-mechanisms",
        "title": "International Coordination Mechanisms",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/coordination-mechanisms/",
        "similarity": 17
      },
      {
        "id": "governance-policy",
        "title": "AI Governance and Policy",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/governance-policy/",
        "similarity": 17
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 8,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 8,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 15,
      "externalLinks": 10,
      "footnotes": 6,
      "references": 6
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 11,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 42,
      "externalLinks": 0,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 30,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "llmSummary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "green",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "red",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:6.5 A:5.5 C:7"
  },
  "readerRank": 407,
  "researchRank": 123,
  "recommendedScore": 157.64
}
External Links

No external links

Backlinks (2)
idtitletyperelationship
critical-uncertaintiesAI Risk Critical Uncertainties Modelcrux
worldview-intervention-mappingWorldview-Intervention Mappinganalysis
Longterm Wiki