AI Alignment Research Agenda Comparison

{
  "id": "research-agendas",
  "wikiId": "E251",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/research-agendas/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/research-agendas.mdx",
  "title": "AI Alignment Research Agenda Comparison",
  "quality": 69,
  "readerImportance": 57.5,
  "researchImportance": 27.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2025-12-28",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Comprehensive comparison of major AI safety research agendas (\\$100M+ Anthropic, \\$50M+ DeepMind, \\$5-10M nonprofits) with detailed funding, team sizes, and failure mode coverage (25-65% per agenda). Estimates 40-60% probability current approaches scale to superhuman AI, with portfolio diversification critical given no single agenda covers all major risks.",
  "description": "Analysis of major AI safety research agendas comparing approaches from Anthropic (\\\\$100M+ annual safety budget, 37-39% team growth), DeepMind (30-50 researchers), ARC, Redwood, and MIRI.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.2,
    "rigor": 6.8,
    "completeness": 7.5,
    "actionability": 7.3
  },
  "category": "responses",
  "subcategory": "alignment",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 4262,
    "tableCount": 7,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 71,
    "externalLinks": 0,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.06,
    "sectionCount": 26,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 12
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 80,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 4262,
  "unconvertedLinks": [],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
  "convertedLinkCount": 39,
  "backlinkCount": 0,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 50,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "few-external-sources",
      "conceptual-content"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "crux",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 22,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "scalable-oversight",
        "title": "Scalable Oversight",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/scalable-oversight/",
        "similarity": 22
      },
      {
        "id": "technical-research",
        "title": "Technical AI Safety Research",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/technical-research/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "anthropic-core-views",
        "title": "Anthropic Core Views",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/anthropic-core-views/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "reasoning",
        "title": "Reasoning and Planning",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/reasoning/",
        "similarity": 19
      },
      {
        "id": "accident-risks",
        "title": "AI Accident Risk Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/accident-risks/",
        "similarity": 19
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 6,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 17,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 34,
      "externalLinks": 21,
      "footnotes": 13,
      "references": 13
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 7,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 71,
      "externalLinks": 0,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 24,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "amber",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "red",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:6.8 A:7.3 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 247,
  "researchRank": 429,
  "recommendedScore": 170.41
}

{
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/research-agendas",
  "eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/research-agendas-questions-and-project-lists"
}

No backlinks