Scientific Knowledge Corruption
scientific-corruptionriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/scientific-corruption/
E276Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "scientific-corruption",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/scientific-corruption/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/scientific-corruption.mdx",
"title": "Scientific Knowledge Corruption",
"quality": 91,
"readerImportance": 37.5,
"researchImportance": 66,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": "outcome",
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Documents AI-enabled scientific fraud with evidence that 2-20% of submissions are from paper mills (field-dependent), 300,000+ fake papers exist, and detection tools are losing an arms race against AI generation. Paper mill output doubles every 1.5 years vs. retractions every 3.5 years. Projects 2027-2030 scenarios ranging from controlled degradation (40% probability) to epistemic collapse (20% probability) affecting medical treatments and policy decisions. Wiley/Hindawi scandal resulted in 11,300+ retractions and \\$35-40M losses.",
"description": "AI-enabled fraud, fake papers, and the collapse of scientific reliability that threatens evidence-based medicine and policy",
"ratings": {
"novelty": 4.5,
"rigor": 5,
"actionability": 3.5,
"completeness": 6
},
"category": "risks",
"subcategory": "epistemic",
"clusters": [
"epistemics",
"ai-safety"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 1937,
"tableCount": 21,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 36,
"externalLinks": 32,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.05,
"sectionCount": 34,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 15
},
"suggestedQuality": 100,
"updateFrequency": 45,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 1937,
"unconvertedLinks": [
{
"text": "Retraction Watch database",
"url": "https://retractiondatabase.org/",
"resourceId": "1418e5e55c4e3b9a",
"resourceTitle": "Retraction Watch Database"
},
{
"text": "Retraction Watch Database",
"url": "https://retractiondatabase.org/",
"resourceId": "1418e5e55c4e3b9a",
"resourceTitle": "Retraction Watch Database"
}
],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 2,
"convertedLinkCount": 30,
"backlinkCount": 3,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 50,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"high-quality"
]
},
"entityType": "risk",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 10,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "historical-revisionism",
"title": "Historical Revisionism",
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/historical-revisionism/",
"similarity": 10
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 9,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 8,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 15,
"externalLinks": 10,
"footnotes": 6,
"references": 6
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 21,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 36,
"externalLinks": 32,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 21,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "green",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "green",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:5 A:3.5 C:6"
},
"readerRank": 397,
"researchRank": 182,
"recommendedScore": 222.39
}External Links
{
"lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/science"
}Backlinks (3)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| epistemic-infrastructure | AI-Era Epistemic Infrastructure | approach | — |
| safety-researcher-gap | AI Safety Talent Supply/Demand Gap Model | analysis | — |
| epistemic-overview | Epistemic Risks (Overview) | concept | — |