Technical Pathway Decomposition
technical-pathwaysanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/technical-pathways/
E416Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "technical-pathways",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/technical-pathways/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/models/technical-pathways.mdx",
"title": "Technical Pathway Decomposition",
"quality": 62,
"readerImportance": 53.5,
"researchImportance": 85.5,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Decomposes AI risk into three pathways (accident 45%, misuse 30%, structural 25% of total 25% x-risk) by mapping 60+ technical variables through causal chains. Finds safety techniques degrading relative to capabilities at frontier scale, with interpretability coverage declining from 25% to 15% and RLHF effectiveness from 55% to 40% at GPT-5 level.",
"description": "This model maps technical pathways from capability advances to catastrophic risk outcomes. It finds that accident risks (deceptive alignment, goal misgeneralization, instrumental convergence) account for 45% of total technical risk, with safety techniques currently degrading relative to capabilities at frontier scale.",
"ratings": {
"focus": 8.5,
"novelty": 4.2,
"rigor": 5.8,
"completeness": 7.5,
"concreteness": 6.8,
"actionability": 6.5
},
"category": "models",
"subcategory": "analysis-models",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 2308,
"tableCount": 7,
"diagramCount": 2,
"internalLinks": 36,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.03,
"sectionCount": 19,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 12
},
"suggestedQuality": 80,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 2308,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 24,
"backlinkCount": 0,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 60,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources"
]
},
"entityType": "analysis",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 18,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "intervention-effectiveness-matrix",
"title": "Intervention Effectiveness Matrix",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/intervention-effectiveness-matrix/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "reasoning",
"title": "Reasoning and Planning",
"path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/reasoning/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "self-improvement",
"title": "Self-Improvement and Recursive Enhancement",
"path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/self-improvement/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "situational-awareness",
"title": "Situational Awareness",
"path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "accident-risks",
"title": "AI Accident Risk Cruxes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/accident-risks/",
"similarity": 17
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 7,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 9,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 18,
"externalLinks": 12,
"footnotes": 7,
"references": 7
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 7,
"diagrams": 2,
"internalLinks": 36,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 10,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "amber",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:4.2 R:5.8 A:6.5 C:7.5"
},
"readerRank": 274,
"researchRank": 52,
"recommendedScore": 172.44
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (0)
No backlinks