Provably Safe AI (davidad agenda)
provably-safeapproachPath: /knowledge-base/responses/provably-safe/
E484Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "provably-safe",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/provably-safe/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/provably-safe.mdx",
"title": "Provably Safe AI (davidad agenda)",
"quality": 65,
"readerImportance": 49.5,
"researchImportance": 29.5,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Davidad's provably safe AI agenda aims to create AI systems with mathematical safety guarantees through formal verification of world models and values, primarily funded by ARIA's £59M Safeguarded AI programme. The approach faces extreme technical challenges (world modeling, value specification) with uncertain tractability but would provide very high effectiveness if successful, addressing misalignment, deception, and power-seeking through proof-based constraints.",
"description": "An ambitious research agenda to design AI systems with mathematical safety guarantees from the ground up, led by ARIA's £59M Safeguarded AI programme with the goal of creating superintelligent systems that are provably beneficial through formal verification of world models and value specifications.",
"ratings": {
"novelty": 5,
"rigor": 5.5,
"actionability": 4,
"completeness": 7
},
"category": "responses",
"subcategory": "alignment-theoretical",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 2155,
"tableCount": 20,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 14,
"externalLinks": 17,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.03,
"sectionCount": 28,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 15
},
"suggestedQuality": 100,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 2155,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 3,
"backlinkCount": 2,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 45,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"conceptual-content"
]
},
"entityType": "approach",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 19,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "formal-verification",
"title": "Formal Verification (AI Safety)",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/formal-verification/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "provable-safe",
"title": "Provable / Guaranteed Safe AI",
"path": "/knowledge-base/intelligence-paradigms/provable-safe/",
"similarity": 17
},
{
"id": "safety-cases",
"title": "AI Safety Cases",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/safety-cases/",
"similarity": 13
},
{
"id": "sleeper-agent-detection",
"title": "Sleeper Agent Detection",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/sleeper-agent-detection/",
"similarity": 13
},
{
"id": "interpretability-sufficient",
"title": "Is Interpretability Sufficient for Safety?",
"path": "/knowledge-base/debates/interpretability-sufficient/",
"similarity": 12
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 7,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 9,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 17,
"externalLinks": 11,
"footnotes": 6,
"references": 6
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 20,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 14,
"externalLinks": 17,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 0,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "green",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "amber",
"externalLinks": "green",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "red",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:5 R:5.5 A:4 C:7"
},
"readerRank": 308,
"researchRank": 422,
"recommendedScore": 176.41
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (2)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| formal-verification | Formal Verification (AI Safety) | approach | — |
| alignment-theoretical-overview | Theoretical Foundations (Overview) | concept | — |