Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki

Carlsmith's Six-Premise Argument

carlsmith-six-premisesanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/carlsmith-six-premises/
E54Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page3 backlinksQuality: 65Updated: 2026-01-28
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "carlsmith-six-premises",
  "wikiId": "E54",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/models/carlsmith-six-premises/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/models/carlsmith-six-premises.mdx",
  "title": "Carlsmith's Six-Premise Argument",
  "quality": 65,
  "readerImportance": 37.5,
  "researchImportance": 67.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-28",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Carlsmith's framework decomposes AI existential risk into six conditional premises (timelines, incentives, alignment difficulty, power-seeking, disempowerment scaling, catastrophe), yielding ~5% risk by 2070 (updated to >10%). Comparison with superforecasters reveals largest disagreements on P3 (alignment difficulty: 40% vs 25%) and P4 (power-seeking: 65% vs 35%), with combined estimates differing ~10-25x.",
  "description": "Joe Carlsmith's probabilistic decomposition of AI existential risk into six conditional premises. Originally estimated ~5% risk by 2070, updated to >10%. The most rigorous public framework for structured x-risk estimation.",
  "ratings": {
    "focus": 9,
    "novelty": 3.5,
    "rigor": 7.5,
    "completeness": 8.5,
    "concreteness": 8,
    "actionability": 6.5
  },
  "category": "models",
  "subcategory": "framework-models",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 2179,
    "tableCount": 9,
    "diagramCount": 3,
    "internalLinks": 14,
    "externalLinks": 6,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.25,
    "sectionCount": 30,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 90,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 2179,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "Carlsmith (2022)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13353",
      "resourceId": "6e597a4dc1f6f860",
      "resourceTitle": "Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?"
    },
    {
      "text": "Superforecaster comparison (2023)",
      "url": "https://joecarlsmith.com/2023/10/18/superforecasting-the-premises-in-is-power-seeking-ai-an-existential-risk/",
      "resourceId": "8d9f2fea7c1b4e3a",
      "resourceTitle": "Superforecasting the Premises in 'Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?'"
    },
    {
      "text": "80,000 Hours problem profile",
      "url": "https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/risks-from-power-seeking-ai/",
      "resourceId": "d9fb00b6393b6112",
      "resourceTitle": "80,000 Hours. \"Risks from Power-Seeking AI Systems\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Good Judgment's superforecasters",
      "url": "https://goodjudgment.com/superforecasting-ai/",
      "resourceId": "08c2804d24be7037",
      "resourceTitle": "Superforecasting AI - Good Judgment"
    },
    {
      "text": "80,000 Hours estimates ~300 people",
      "url": "https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/risks-from-power-seeking-ai/",
      "resourceId": "d9fb00b6393b6112",
      "resourceTitle": "80,000 Hours. \"Risks from Power-Seeking AI Systems\""
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 5,
  "convertedLinkCount": 5,
  "backlinkCount": 3,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 40,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "high-rigor"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "analysis",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 17,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "instrumental-convergence",
        "title": "Instrumental Convergence",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/instrumental-convergence/",
        "similarity": 17
      },
      {
        "id": "case-for-xrisk",
        "title": "The Case FOR AI Existential Risk",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/debates/case-for-xrisk/",
        "similarity": 16
      },
      {
        "id": "sleeper-agent-detection",
        "title": "Sleeper Agent Detection",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/sleeper-agent-detection/",
        "similarity": 16
      },
      {
        "id": "power-seeking",
        "title": "Power-Seeking AI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/power-seeking/",
        "similarity": 16
      },
      {
        "id": "mesa-optimization",
        "title": "Mesa-Optimization",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/mesa-optimization/",
        "similarity": 15
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 6,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 9,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 17,
      "externalLinks": 11,
      "footnotes": 7,
      "references": 7
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 9,
      "diagrams": 3,
      "internalLinks": 14,
      "externalLinks": 6,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 4,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "green",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "amber",
      "externalLinks": "amber",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "amber",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:3.5 R:7.5 A:6.5 C:8.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 394,
  "researchRank": 165,
  "recommendedScore": 152.73
}
External Links

No external links

Backlinks (3)
idtitletyperelationship
__index__/knowledge-baseKnowledge Baseconcept—
__index__/knowledge-base/modelsAnalytical Modelsconcept—
longtermist-value-comparisonsRelative Longtermist Value Comparisonsanalysis—