Design Sketches for Collective Epistemics
collective-epistemics-design-sketchesapproachPath: /knowledge-base/responses/collective-epistemics-design-sketches/
E588Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "collective-epistemics-design-sketches",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/collective-epistemics-design-sketches/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/collective-epistemics-design-sketches.mdx",
"title": "Design Sketches for Collective Epistemics",
"quality": 48,
"readerImportance": 69.5,
"researchImportance": 71,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": null,
"description": "Forethought Foundation's five proposed technologies for improving collective epistemics: community notes for everything, rhetoric highlighting, reliability tracking, epistemic virtue evals, and provenance tracing. These design sketches aim to shift society toward high-honesty equilibria.",
"ratings": {
"novelty": 5.5,
"rigor": 4.5,
"actionability": 6,
"completeness": 5
},
"category": "responses",
"subcategory": "epistemic-approaches",
"clusters": [
"epistemics",
"ai-safety"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 1391,
"tableCount": 3,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 12,
"externalLinks": 5,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.13,
"sectionCount": 10,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 12
},
"suggestedQuality": 80,
"updateFrequency": 45,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 1391,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 0,
"backlinkCount": 6,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 45,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"conceptual-content"
]
},
"entityType": "approach",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 15,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "epistemic-virtue-evals",
"title": "Epistemic Virtue Evals",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/epistemic-virtue-evals/",
"similarity": 15
},
{
"id": "community-notes-for-everything",
"title": "Community Notes for Everything",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/community-notes-for-everything/",
"similarity": 14
},
{
"id": "provenance-tracing",
"title": "AI Content Provenance Tracing",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/provenance-tracing/",
"similarity": 14
},
{
"id": "reliability-tracking",
"title": "AI System Reliability Tracking",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/reliability-tracking/",
"similarity": 14
},
{
"id": "rhetoric-highlighting",
"title": "AI-Assisted Rhetoric Highlighting",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/rhetoric-highlighting/",
"similarity": 14
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 5,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 6,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 11,
"externalLinks": 7,
"footnotes": 4,
"references": 4
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 3,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 12,
"externalLinks": 5,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 0,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "red",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "amber",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "amber",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "red",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:5.5 R:4.5 A:6 C:5"
},
"readerRank": 170,
"researchRank": 143,
"recommendedScore": 152.25
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (6)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| community-notes-for-everything | Community Notes for Everything | approach | — |
| epistemic-tools-approaches-overview | Approaches (Overview) | concept | — |
| epistemic-virtue-evals | Epistemic Virtue Evals | approach | — |
| provenance-tracing | AI Content Provenance Tracing | approach | — |
| reliability-tracking | AI System Reliability Tracking | approach | — |
| rhetoric-highlighting | AI-Assisted Rhetoric Highlighting | approach | — |