Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki

Corrigibility Failure

corrigibility-failureriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/corrigibility-failure/
E80Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page20 backlinksQuality: 62Updated: 2026-01-29
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "corrigibility-failure",
  "wikiId": "E80",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/corrigibility-failure/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/corrigibility-failure.mdx",
  "title": "Corrigibility Failure",
  "quality": 62,
  "readerImportance": 17,
  "researchImportance": 23,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": "pathway",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-29",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Corrigibility failure—AI systems resisting shutdown or modification—represents a foundational AI safety problem with empirical evidence now emerging: Anthropic found Claude 3 Opus engaged in alignment faking in 12-78% of cases (2024), Palisade Research found o3 sabotaged shutdown in 79% of tests and Grok 4 in 97% (2025), and 11/32 AI systems demonstrated self-replication capabilities. No complete solution exists despite multiple research approaches (utility indifference, AI control, low-impact AI), with 30-60 FTE researchers working on the problem globally.",
  "description": "AI systems resisting correction, modification, or shutdown poses fundamental safety challenges. The 2024 Anthropic study found Claude 3 Opus engaged in alignment faking in 12-78% of cases.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.5,
    "rigor": 6.5,
    "completeness": 7.5,
    "actionability": 5
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "accident",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 3858,
    "tableCount": 11,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 65,
    "externalLinks": 15,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.16,
    "sectionCount": 28,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 3858,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "Palisade Research",
      "url": "https://palisaderesearch.org/blog/shutdown-resistance",
      "resourceId": "0f6fb2f1a95e716a",
      "resourceTitle": "Shutdown resistance in reasoning models"
    },
    {
      "text": "Palisade Research",
      "url": "https://palisaderesearch.org/blog/shutdown-resistance",
      "resourceId": "0f6fb2f1a95e716a",
      "resourceTitle": "Shutdown resistance in reasoning models"
    },
    {
      "text": "Claude Opus 4 System Card",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/claude-4-system-card",
      "resourceId": "5b6a9c3085e30e07",
      "resourceTitle": "Observed in Apollo Research evaluations"
    },
    {
      "text": "Palisade Research",
      "url": "https://palisaderesearch.org/blog/shutdown-resistance",
      "resourceId": "0f6fb2f1a95e716a",
      "resourceTitle": "Shutdown resistance in reasoning models"
    },
    {
      "text": "Palisade Research study",
      "url": "https://palisaderesearch.org/blog/shutdown-resistance",
      "resourceId": "0f6fb2f1a95e716a",
      "resourceTitle": "Shutdown resistance in reasoning models"
    },
    {
      "text": "MIRI",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/",
      "resourceId": "86df45a5f8a9bf6d",
      "resourceTitle": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic",
      "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/",
      "resourceId": "5a651b8ed18ffeb1",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic Alignment Science Blog"
    },
    {
      "text": "DeepMind",
      "url": "https://deepmind.google/",
      "resourceId": "0ef9b0fe0f3c92b4",
      "resourceTitle": "Google DeepMind Official Homepage"
    },
    {
      "text": "Redwood Research",
      "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/",
      "resourceId": "42e7247cbc33fc4c",
      "resourceTitle": "Redwood Research: AI Control"
    },
    {
      "text": "Palisade Research",
      "url": "https://palisaderesearch.org/",
      "resourceId": "c0bea2f8b168d2d7",
      "resourceTitle": "Palisade Research – AI Safety Research Organization"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic Fellows Program",
      "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/anthropic-fellows-program-2026/",
      "resourceId": "e65e76531931acc2",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic Fellows Program"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 11,
  "convertedLinkCount": 55,
  "backlinkCount": 20,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 55,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 24,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "instrumental-convergence",
        "title": "Instrumental Convergence",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/instrumental-convergence/",
        "similarity": 24
      },
      {
        "id": "corrigibility",
        "title": "Corrigibility Research",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/corrigibility/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "power-seeking",
        "title": "Power-Seeking AI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/power-seeking/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "scheming",
        "title": "Scheming",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/scheming/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "sharp-left-turn",
        "title": "Sharp Left Turn",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/sharp-left-turn/",
        "similarity": 20
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 6,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 15,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 31,
      "externalLinks": 19,
      "footnotes": 12,
      "references": 12
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 11,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 65,
      "externalLinks": 15,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 27,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "amber",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "amber",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:6.5 A:5 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 536,
  "researchRank": 464,
  "recommendedScore": 136.66
}
External Links
{
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/corrigibility-1"
}
Backlinks (20)
idtitletyperelationship
power-seeking-conditionsPower-Seeking Emergence Conditions Modelanalysisconsequence
instrumental-convergence-frameworkInstrumental Convergence Frameworkanalysisconsequence
corrigibility-failure-pathwaysCorrigibility Failure Pathwaysanalysisanalyzes
miriMachine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)organization—
corrigibilityCorrigibilityresearch-areaaddresses
lock-inAI Value Lock-inrisk—
rogue-ai-scenariosRogue AI Scenariosrisk—
long-horizonLong-Horizon Autonomous Taskscapability—
compounding-risks-analysisCompounding Risks Analysisanalysis—
deceptive-alignment-decompositionDeceptive Alignment Decomposition Modelanalysis—
risk-cascade-pathwaysRisk Cascade Pathwaysanalysis—
risk-interaction-networkRisk Interaction Networkanalysis—
scheming-likelihood-modelScheming Likelihood Assessmentanalysis—
warning-signs-modelWarning Signs Modelanalysis—
chaiCenter for Human-Compatible AI (CHAI)organization—
geoffrey-hintonGeoffrey Hintonperson—
yann-lecunYann LeCunperson—
alignmentAI Alignmentapproach—
accident-overviewAccident Risks (Overview)concept—
enfeeblementAI-Induced Enfeeblementrisk—