International Compute Regimes
InternationalMultilateral coordination mechanisms for AI compute governance, exploring pathways from non-binding declarations to comprehensive treaties. Assessment finds 10-25% chance of meaningful regimes by 2035, but potential for 30-60% reduction in racing dynamics if achieved.
Related Legislation
| Name | Status |
|---|---|
| AI Safety Institutes (AISIs) | — |
| US AI Chip Export Controls | in-effect |
| Compute Monitoring | — |
| Compute Thresholds | — |
| Bletchley Declaration | in-effect |
Related Pages
Top Related Pages
Compute Thresholds
Analysis of compute thresholds as regulatory triggers, examining current implementations (EU AI Act at 10^25 FLOP, US EO at 10^26 FLOP), their effe...
Compute Monitoring
This framework analyzes compute monitoring approaches for AI governance, finding that cloud KYC (targeting 10^26 FLOP threshold) is implementable n...
US AI Chip Export Controls
US restrictions on semiconductor exports targeting China have disrupted near-term AI development but face significant limitations. Analysis finds c...
Hardware-Enabled Governance
Technical mechanisms built into AI chips enabling monitoring, access control, and enforcement of AI governance policies. RAND analysis identifies a...
AI Safety Institutes (AISIs)
Government-affiliated technical institutions evaluating frontier AI systems, with the UK/US institutes having secured pre-deployment access to mode...
Quick Facts
- Scope
- International