Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki
VK

Victoria Krakovna

Research scientist at Google DeepMind working on AI safety; co-founder of the Future of Life Institute

Organization Roles1

Research Scientist; Specification Gaming
2017 – present

Board Seats2

ArkoseCurrent
Strategic Advisor

Education

PhD in Statistics and Machine Learning, Harvard University

From wiki articleRead full article →

Quick Assessment

DimensionAssessment
Primary RoleResearch Scientist, Google DeepMind (2017–present)
Co-founding RoleCo-founder, Future of Life Institute (FLI) (2014)
Key ContributionsMaintains the widely-cited "Specification Gaming Examples" public list (launched 2018); co-authored DeepMind's seminal 2020 specification-gaming blog post; lead and co-author on impact-regularization and side-effect avoidance papers (Relative Reachability, Attainable Utility Preservation)
EducationPhD in Statistics, Harvard University (2017)
Public ProfileActive on the Alignment Forum and Twitter/X; collaborates broadly across DeepMind's alignment, agent-safety, and goal-misgeneralization research lines

Overview

Victoria Krakovna is an AI safety researcher who works as a Research Scientist at Google DeepMind and is a co-founder of the Future of Life Institute. Her academic background is in statistics — she completed her PhD at Harvard in 2017 — and her research at DeepMind has centered on specification gaming, side effects, goal misgeneralization, and impact regularization as approaches to making reinforcement-learning agents safer.

She is most widely known among practitioners for maintaining a public "Specification Gaming Examples" list, a continuously updated catalog of real-world cases where AI systems found unintended ways to satisfy their formal objectives. The list is a frequent reference in introductory AI safety material and has been cited in research papers, talks, and policy briefings as evidence that reward hacking is not a theoretical concern.