Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

What (standalone) LessWrong posts would you recommend to most EA community members?

web

Author

Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸

Credibility Rating

3/5
Good(3)

Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.

Rating inherited from publication venue: EA Forum

This EA Forum thread aggregates community-recommended LessWrong posts, making it a useful starting point for those seeking rationalist perspectives relevant to AI safety, existential risk, and effective altruism decision-making.

Forum Post Details

Karma
67
Comments
20
Forum
eaforum
Forum Tags
LessWrong

Metadata

Importance: 45/100reference

Summary

A community discussion thread on the EA Forum where members share and recommend standout LessWrong posts valuable for effective altruists. The thread serves as a curated reading list bridging rationalist and EA intellectual communities, highlighting foundational thinking on decision-making, epistemics, and existential risk.

Key Points

  • Crowdsourced recommendations from EA community members identifying high-value LessWrong content
  • Bridges the rationalist (LessWrong) and effective altruism communities by surfacing shared intellectual resources
  • Likely highlights posts on epistemics, cognitive biases, decision theory, and existential risk relevant to EA priorities
  • Functions as a curated entry point for EAs less familiar with the LessWrong canon
  • Reflects community consensus on which rationalist ideas are most practically useful for EA work

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Apr 7, 20261 KB
# What (standalone) LessWrong posts would you recommend to most EA community members?
By Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸
Published: 2022-02-09
**Edit 11 Feb 2022:** Jeremy made a post about starting a [low-commitment LW Article club](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/K9JP6T6u6ujHiGFFD/low-commitment-less-wrong-book-eg-article-club) where he'd be linkposting articles on a weekly basis from this list for people to engage with! 

Context / Motivation: 

*   I am interested in thinking a lot recently about how we could share ideas from the rationalist community to EA and related subcommunities (perhaps communicating the same ideas in different ways).
*   I've been diving into LessWrong recently and remembered why I hadn't for a while - it's **really overwhelming.** Even with the sequences and curation, it's a lot of content, and it's not always obvious to me which posts I'd find most valuable.
*   I think it's better to read fewer posts in more depth to properly understand them.
*   I think it's likely that some posts or ideas will be much more relevant to EAs than others, but I'm not sure which ones

My ask:

*   I'd be interested in recommendations for standlone posts ([e.g. All debates are bravery debates](https://www.lesswrong.com/s/XsMTxdQ6fprAQMoKi/p/PQ3nutgxfTgvq69Xt)), specific concepts (e.g. schelling fence or doublecrux) , or specific sequences ([e.g.](https://www.lesswrong.com/s/hBFDRZCPLcrRDubgm))
*   If you have time, I'd love to know why it's valuable to you
Resource ID: 0a3dcbada0794e9a | Stable ID: sid_1BBWEPmuIF