Back
What (standalone) LessWrong posts would you recommend to most EA community members?
webAuthor
Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸
Credibility Rating
3/5
Good(3)Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.
Rating inherited from publication venue: EA Forum
This EA Forum thread aggregates community-recommended LessWrong posts, making it a useful starting point for those seeking rationalist perspectives relevant to AI safety, existential risk, and effective altruism decision-making.
Forum Post Details
Karma
67
Comments
20
Forum
eaforum
Forum Tags
LessWrong
Metadata
Importance: 45/100reference
Summary
A community discussion thread on the EA Forum where members share and recommend standout LessWrong posts valuable for effective altruists. The thread serves as a curated reading list bridging rationalist and EA intellectual communities, highlighting foundational thinking on decision-making, epistemics, and existential risk.
Key Points
- •Crowdsourced recommendations from EA community members identifying high-value LessWrong content
- •Bridges the rationalist (LessWrong) and effective altruism communities by surfacing shared intellectual resources
- •Likely highlights posts on epistemics, cognitive biases, decision theory, and existential risk relevant to EA priorities
- •Functions as a curated entry point for EAs less familiar with the LessWrong canon
- •Reflects community consensus on which rationalist ideas are most practically useful for EA work
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 7, 20261 KB
# What (standalone) LessWrong posts would you recommend to most EA community members? By Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸 Published: 2022-02-09 **Edit 11 Feb 2022:** Jeremy made a post about starting a [low-commitment LW Article club](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/K9JP6T6u6ujHiGFFD/low-commitment-less-wrong-book-eg-article-club) where he'd be linkposting articles on a weekly basis from this list for people to engage with! Context / Motivation: * I am interested in thinking a lot recently about how we could share ideas from the rationalist community to EA and related subcommunities (perhaps communicating the same ideas in different ways). * I've been diving into LessWrong recently and remembered why I hadn't for a while - it's **really overwhelming.** Even with the sequences and curation, it's a lot of content, and it's not always obvious to me which posts I'd find most valuable. * I think it's better to read fewer posts in more depth to properly understand them. * I think it's likely that some posts or ideas will be much more relevant to EAs than others, but I'm not sure which ones My ask: * I'd be interested in recommendations for standlone posts ([e.g. All debates are bravery debates](https://www.lesswrong.com/s/XsMTxdQ6fprAQMoKi/p/PQ3nutgxfTgvq69Xt)), specific concepts (e.g. schelling fence or doublecrux) , or specific sequences ([e.g.](https://www.lesswrong.com/s/hBFDRZCPLcrRDubgm)) * If you have time, I'd love to know why it's valuable to you
Resource ID:
0a3dcbada0794e9a | Stable ID: sid_1BBWEPmuIF