Back
Bail et al. 2018
webPNAS(peer-reviewed)·pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
Credibility Rating
5/5
Gold(5)Gold standard. Rigorous peer review, high editorial standards, and strong institutional reputation.
Rating inherited from publication venue: PNAS
Data Status
Metadata onlyFetched Dec 28, 2025
Cited by 2 pages
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Sycophancy Feedback Loop Model | Analysis | 53.0 |
| AI Preference Manipulation | Risk | 55.0 |
Resource ID:
23a9c979fe23842a | Stable ID: ZjE1ODExNT