Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki

Authors

utilistrutil·Juan Gil·yams·LauraVaughan·K Richards·Ryan Kidd

Credibility Rating

3/5
Good(3)

Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.

Rating inherited from publication venue: LessWrong

MATS (Machine Learning for Alignment Taskforce) is a structured mentorship and research program; this retrospective offers empirical data on the effectiveness of AI safety field-building programs, useful for evaluating similar training and fellowship initiatives.

Forum Post Details

Karma
62
Comments
7
Forum
lesswrong
Forum Tags
AI Alignment FieldbuildingMATS ProgramPostmortems & RetrospectivesAI

Metadata

Importance: 42/100organizational reportanalysis

Summary

A survey-based impact analysis of 72 alumni (46% response rate) from MATS program cohorts Winter 2021-22 through Summer 2023, showing strong alignment field engagement: 78% working on AI alignment, 68% publishing alignment research, and 63% meeting research collaborators through the program. The report provides evidence that MATS effectively builds career capital and facilitates research collaboration for early-career AI safety professionals.

Key Points

  • •78% of respondents work on AI alignment/control or conduct independent alignment research, with 49% in formal alignment roles.
  • •54% of alumni who applied to jobs advanced past the first round of interviews, with 64% of those accepting job offers.
  • •68% published alignment research, with 78% attributing their publication at least partly to MATS participation.
  • •63% of alumni met a research collaborator through MATS, addressing a key bottleneck for early-career researchers.
  • •Alumni backgrounds: 40% bachelor's, 40% master's, 20% PhD—demonstrating MATS serves researchers at multiple career stages.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
MATS ML Alignment Theory Scholars programOrganization60.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Apr 7, 202625 KB
# MATS Alumni Impact Analysis
By utilistrutil, Juan Gil, yams, LauraVaughan, K Richards, Ryan Kidd
Published: 2024-09-30
Summary
=======

This winter, [MATS](https://www.matsprogram.org/) will be running our seventh program. In early-mid 2024, 46% of alumni from our first four programs (Winter 2021-22 to Summer 2023) completed a survey about their career progress since participating in MATS. This report presents key findings from the responses of these 72 alumni.

*   78% of respondents described their current work as "Working/interning on AI alignment/control" or "Conducting alignment research independently."
    *   49% are "Working/interning on AI alignment/control."
    *   29% are "Conducting alignment research independently."
    *   1.4% are "Working/interning on AI capabilities."
*   Since MATS, 54% of respondents applied to a job and advanced past the first round of interviews.
    *   64% of those who shared more details accepted a job offer.
    *   Alumni reported that MATS made it more likely that they applied to these jobs by helping them build legible career capital and develop research/technical skills.
*   During or since MATS, 68% of alumni had published alignment research.
    *   The most common type of publication was a LessWrong post (45%).
    *   78% of respondents said their publication “possibly” or “probably” would not have happened without MATS.
    *   10% of alumni reported that MATS accelerated publication by more than 6 months; 14% said 1-6 months.
    *   8% of alumni responded that MATS resulted in a “much higher” quality of their publication.
*   63% of scholars met a research collaborator through MATS
*   At this stage in their careers, 46% of alumni would benefit from more connections to research collaborators, and 39% would benefit from job recommendations.

Background on Cohort
====================

For 40% of respondents, their highest academic degree was a Bachelor’s; 40% had earned at most a Master’s, and 20%, a PhD.

![](https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXeS8MV3mJvK01jaXraQHfDwjyfMxcPbdNS99PNA3SHxznIhCiizoEQbyx-VPr3JP74faD2psJhxsVvvhY5jxs5_cW4iNDGFfG_BZq_MzyI0s1iUFpQrcoVZ3zc1s6ZAOvBKMA3k9JXEwv5v1oryHQq2h3V8?key=fSKMQMSy-zcSqk3gLh0yiw)

Their most common categories of current work were “Working/interning on AI alignment/control” (49%) and “Conducting alignment research independently” (29%).

![](https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXf37xTu6Oby7yETfwH7uFhaMGWkGG36MK5mPSTgqwmstzERtpxJH2DeIrONZVvrYFhQsNr_HAl_cu_iCTQkROGkAs7hfzMc25Mz-k0Lq8RmlKDI77tfIOGsYnGfMl1EC1a5ZlCzG6etTJKdN1nWMTX_dL4?key=fSKMQMSy-zcSqk3gLh0yiw)

Here are some representative descriptions of the work alumni were doing:

*   “Going through the first year of grad school at Oxford and continuing research that emerged from my time at MATS.”
*   “Working on an interpretability project at AI Safety Camp and just finished the s-risk intro fellowship by CLR a week or two ago.”
*   “What could be called "prosaic agent founda

... (truncated, 25 KB total)
Resource ID: 34adf176d8299b24 | Stable ID: sid_AU2VHncdOi