From Birdwatch to Community Notes, from Twitter to X - arXiv
paperCredibility Rating
3/5
Good(3)Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.
Rating inherited from publication venue: arXiv
Metadata
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| X Community Notes | Project | 54.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched May 30, 202660 KB
From Birdwatch to Community Notes, from Twitter to X:
four years of community-based content moderation
Saeedeh Mohammadi
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Narges Chinichian
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
SPICED Academy, Berlin, Germany
These authors contributed equally
Hannah Doyal
SPICED Academy, Berlin, Germany
These authors contributed equally
Kristina Skutilova
School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Hao Cui
School of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Michele d’Errico
School of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Siobhan Grayson
School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Taha Yasseri
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
School of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
SUMMARY
Community Notes (formerly known as Birdwatch) is the first large-scale crowdsourced content moderation initiative that was launched by X (formerly known as Twitter) in January 2021. As the Community Notes model gains momentum across other social media platforms, there is a growing need to assess its underlying dynamics and effectiveness. This Resource paper provides (a) a systematic review of the literature on Community Notes, and (b) a major curated dataset and accompanying source code to support future research on Community Notes. We parsed Notes and Ratings data from the first four years of the program and conducted language detection across all Notes. Focusing on English-language Notes, we extracted embedded URLs and identified discussion topics in each Note. Additionally, we constructed monthly interaction networks among the Contributors. Together with the literature review, these resources offer a robust foundation for advancing research on the Community Notes system.
KEYWORDS
Content Moderation, Community Notes, Birdwatch, Network Analysis, Topic Modelling
INTRODUCTION
The rapid production and spread of user-generated content on social media platforms in the absence of editorial oversight has increased users’ exposure to false or misleading information 1 . In response, social media platforms have taken various approaches to content moderation. Content Moderation refers to the process of monitoring, flagging, or removing content that violates community guidelines or is deemed harmful. The main moderation strategies have been expert review and algorithmic systems. However, each comes with limitations. Expert evaluation, while often accurate, is costly and impractical at scale, given the sheer volume of content that needs moderation 2 . Automated algorithmic methods,
... (truncated, 60 KB total)Resource ID:
370352fee047177c | Stable ID: sid_baRR42GOtA