Back
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter (Wikipedia)
referenceCredibility Rating
3/5
Good(3)Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.
Rating inherited from publication venue: Wikipedia
Landmark public advocacy moment in AI safety history; useful reference for understanding the 2023 AI governance debate and the gap between safety calls and industry practice.
Metadata
Importance: 62/100wiki pagereference
Summary
Wikipedia article covering the March 2023 Future of Life Institute open letter calling for a 6-month pause on training AI systems more powerful than GPT-4, signed by over 30,000 people including prominent researchers and executives. The letter cited risks including AI propaganda, job automation, human obsolescence, and loss of societal control, and called for increased safety research and government regulation. Despite widespread attention, no pause materialized and AI development accelerated.
Key Points
- •Published by the Future of Life Institute in March 2023, one week after GPT-4's release, calling for a 6-month pause on training AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
- •Received 30,000+ signatures from figures including Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and Yuval Noah Harari.
- •Cited risks such as AI-generated propaganda, extreme job automation, human obsolescence, and societal loss of control in a race-to-the-bottom dynamic.
- •Called for government regulation, independent audits, tracking of powerful AI systems, and robust public funding for AI safety research.
- •Despite generating renewed governmental urgency around AI governance, AI companies continued accelerating development with vast infrastructure investments.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Future of Life Institute (FLI) | Organization | 46.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 7, 202612 KB
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter - Wikipedia
Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023 letter calling for a pause on AI system training
Part of a series on Artificial intelligence (AI)
Major goals
Artificial general intelligence
Intelligent agent
Recursive self-improvement
Planning
Computer vision
General game playing
Knowledge representation
Natural language processing
Robotics
AI safety
Approaches
Machine learning
Symbolic
Deep learning
Bayesian networks
Evolutionary algorithms
Hybrid intelligent systems
Systems integration
Open-source
AI data centers
Applications
Bioinformatics
Deepfake
Earth sciences
Finance
Generative AI
Art
Audio
Music
Government
Healthcare
Mental health
Industry
Software development
Translation
Military
Physics
Projects
Philosophy
AI alignment
Artificial consciousness
The bitter lesson
Chinese room
Friendly AI
Ethics
Existential risk
Turing test
Uncanny valley
Human–AI interaction
History
Timeline
Progress
AI winter
AI boom
AI bubble
Controversies
Deepfake pornography
Taylor Swift deepfake pornography controversy
Grok sexual deepfake scandal
Google Gemini image generation controversy
It's the Most Terrible Time of the Year
Pause Giant AI Experiments
Removal of Sam Altman from OpenAI
Statement on AI Risk
Tay (chatbot)
Théâtre D'opéra Spatial
Voiceverse NFT plagiarism scandal
Glossary
Glossary
v
t
e
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter is the title of a letter published by the Future of Life Institute in March 2023. The letter calls "all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4 ", citing risks such as AI-generated propaganda, extreme automation of jobs, human obsolescence, and a society-wide loss of control. [ 1 ] It received more than 30,000 signatures, including academic AI researchers and industry CEOs such as Yoshua Bengio , Stuart Russell , Elon Musk , Steve Wozniak and Yuval Noah Harari . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]
Motivations
[ edit ]
The publication occurred a week after the release of OpenAI 's large language model GPT-4 . It asserts that current large language models are "becoming human-competitive at general tasks", referencing a paper about early experiments of GPT-4, described as having "Sparks of AGI ". [ 4 ] AGI is described as posing numerous important risks, especially in a context of race-to-the-bottom dynamics in which some AI labs may be incentivized to overlook security to deploy products more quickly. [ 5 ]
It asks to refocus AI research on making powerful AI systems "more ac
... (truncated, 12 KB total)Resource ID:
4fc41c1e8720f41f | Stable ID: sid_rEZeyFFN92