Back
Western nations worry that UN involvement could open the door to Chinese and autocratic influence
webPublished by the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) in July 2024, this piece reflects transatlantic concerns about geopolitical competition over AI governance and the risk that multilateral UN processes could be captured by authoritarian states.
Metadata
Importance: 42/100opinion pieceanalysis
Summary
This CEPA analysis examines Western democracies' concerns about UN Secretary-General Guterres' High-Level AI Advisory Board, arguing that the UN's opaque governance process and inclusive framing could enable China and autocratic states to shape global AI policy. The article critiques the UN's rushed consultations and proposed new bureaucratic structures as potentially undermining democratic AI governance frameworks already established by the G7, EU, and OECD.
Key Points
- •UN Secretary-General Guterres established a High-Level AI Advisory Board in Oct 2023, framed as ensuring Global South inclusion in AI governance.
- •Western democracies fear UN involvement opens the door to Chinese and autocratic influence over AI governance structures.
- •The board's process was criticized as opaque and perfunctory, with stakeholder feedback largely ignored in draft final reports.
- •The UN proposal calls for new institutions including an International Scientific Panel on AI, a Policy Dialogue on AI governance, and an AI Standards Exchange.
- •Multiple competing AI governance frameworks already exist (G7, EU AI Act, Council of Europe treaty, OECD), raising questions about UN added value.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Failed and Stalled AI Proposals | Analysis | 63.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 9, 20269 KB
UN Attempts AI Power Grab. The West is Unhappy - CEPA
Geopolitics
Technology
Defense Tech
Insights & Analysis
Latest Commentary
Comprehensive Reports
Podcasts
The CEPA Podcast
Inside Cyber Diplomacy Redux
Events
All Events
CEPA Forum
State of the Alliance
Transcripts
About
Experts
Our Fellows
Our Team
CEPA at 20
Issues
Security and Defense
Authoritarian Threats
Behind the Lines
Behind the Lines Tracker
Technology and Innovation
Transatlantic Tech Policy Tracker
Democracy
Programs
Democratic Resilience
Transatlantic Defense and Security
Tech Policy Program
Defense Tech Initiative
Team
Supporters
Work With Us
Contact
CEPA Washington DC HQ
CEPA Europe
CEPA Brussels
CEPA London
Support Now
Insights & Analysis
Article
Bandwidth
UN Attempts AI Power Grab. The West is Unhappy
Under the guise of giving China and the global South a strong voice on artificial intelligence policy, United Nations bureaucrats are trying to take over AI governance. Democracies object.
a:hover]:text-red ">
By Fiona Alexander
July 24, 2024
Everybody, it seems, wants to govern AI. The G7 “Hiroshima AI Process” produced voluntary guiding principles. The UK and South Korea held AI Safety summits . The US , Japan , and Canada , among others, have set up AI safety institutes. The Strasbourg-based Council of Europe produced a treaty on AI’s impact on human rights and the rule of law and the European Union legislated the AI Act . The OECD , the G20 , and UN specialized agencies such as the ITU , and UNESCO have ongoing AI efforts.
Not to be left out, the UN headquarters in New York is now getting into the act. With the stated intent of “ fostering a globally inclusive approach ,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres established a High-Level AI Advisory Board . But the US and its allies worry that the UN involvement could open the door to China and autocratic control over the revolutionary technology.
The UN’s goal is laudable: ensure that the Global South is included in AI governance. The problem is that the UN works in a secretive, opaque fashion. Established in October 2023, the high-level board put out interim recommendations only two months later. While the board itself includes AII specialists such as Op
... (truncated, 9 KB total)Resource ID:
6c58ff596c71969a | Stable ID: sid_QGh2FMQZ0a