Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

The Artificial General Intelligence Race and International Security

web

Credibility Rating

4/5
High(4)

High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.

Rating inherited from publication venue: RAND Corporation

A RAND/Perry World House edited volume examining how the US-China AGI race may reshape international security, nuclear stability, and governance, directly relevant to AI safety through its focus on catastrophic risks and novel governance frameworks for advanced AI.

Metadata

Importance: 72/100organizational reportanalysis

Summary

This RAND report compiles expert analyses on the geopolitical and security implications of the AGI race, particularly between the US and China. It examines whether the greatest risks arise during the pre-AGI transition period or from the competitive race itself, and whether AGI will alter nuclear balances or democratize destructive capabilities. The authors propose novel governance models, including an 'AI cartel' framework, to manage military versus civilian AGI applications.

Key Points

  • The US-China AGI race is expected to intensify amid broader strategic competition, raising urgent international security concerns.
  • Key debate: whether greatest risks stem from the ambiguous pre-AGI period or from the rapid competitive race dynamics itself.
  • AGI may fundamentally alter nuclear deterrence or primarily democratize access to destructive capabilities—both scenarios pose serious risks.
  • Traditional arms control frameworks are deemed ill-suited for AGI; novel models like an 'AI cartel' distinguishing military from civilian use are proposed.
  • Strategic dilemmas of speed vs. caution, perception vs. reality, and competition vs. collusion require deliberate policy choices.

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Apr 11, 20267 KB
The Artificial General Intelligence Race and International Security | RAND
 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 Feb
 MAR
 Apr
 

 
 

 
 22
 
 

 
 

 2025
 2026
 2027
 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
success

 
fail

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 About this capture
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
COLLECTED BY

 

 

 
 
Collection: Save Page Now Outlinks

 

 

 

 

 
TIMESTAMPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20260322045003/https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4155-1.html

 
 

Skip to page content

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 Toggle Menu
 

 
Site-wide navigation

 
 

 
Topics

 

 
Trending

 

International Trade

Iran

Artificial Intelligence

Chronic Diseases and Conditions

Emergency Preparedness

 
Topics

 
Children, Families, and Communities

Cyber and Data Sciences

Education and Literacy

Energy and Environment

Health, Health Care, and Aging

Homeland Security and Public Safety

Infrastructure and Transportation

International Affairs

Law and Business

National Security

Science and Technology

Workers and the Workplace

 All Topics
 

 

 

 Research & Commentary
 

 

 Experts
 

 

 About
 

 
 

 
 

 
Research Divisions

 

 
RAND's divisions conduct research on a uniquely broad front for clients around the globe.

 
 

 
U.S. research divisions

 
 
RAND Army Research Division

 
RAND Education, Employment, and Infrastructure

 
RAND Global and Emerging Risks

 
RAND Health

 
RAND Homeland Security Research Division

 
RAND National Security Research Division

 
RAND Project AIR FORCE

 
 

 

 
International research divisions

 
 
RAND Australia

 
RAND Europe

 
 

 
 

 

 

 Services & Impact
 

 

 Careers
 

 

 Graduate School
 

 

 Subscribe
 

 

 Give
 

 
Cart

 

 

 

 
 
 
 Toggle Search
 
Search termsSubmit

 
 

 

 

 
RAND

Research & Commentary

Expert Insights

PE-A4155-1

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

The Artificial General Intelligence Race and International Security

Edited by Jim Mitre, Michael C. Horowitz, Natalia Henry, Emma Borden, Joel B. Predd

Contributors: Sarah Kreps, Miles Brundage, James D. Fearon, Karl P. Mueller, Jane Vaynman, Tristan A. Volpe

 Expert InsightsPublished Sep 24, 2025

 

 
 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 Download PDF
 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 

Share on LinkedIn

Share on X

Share on Facebook

Email

As humanity approaches the technological capacity to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), the race between leading artificial intelligence (AI) powers—particularly the United States and China—is likely to intensify amid broader U.S.-China strategic competition. Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania and the RAND Geopolitics of AGI Initiative commissioned papers by experts in AI, international relations, and national security to examine the dynamics of the AGI race and its potential implications for international security and stabilit

... (truncated, 7 KB total)
Resource ID: a976c9da7efdabe1 | Stable ID: sid_JZYfdqAheD