Back
voluntary commitments only lead to socially beneficial outcomes when combined with enforcement mechanisms
webCredibility Rating
4/5
High(4)High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: ScienceDirect
Relevant to ongoing debates about whether voluntary AI safety commitments from labs are sufficient, or whether binding regulation and enforcement are needed to ensure compliance and meaningful safety outcomes.
Metadata
Importance: 62/100journal articleanalysis
Summary
This paper examines the limitations of voluntary commitments in producing socially beneficial outcomes, arguing that such commitments are insufficient without accompanying enforcement mechanisms. It analyzes the conditions under which voluntary pledges fail to achieve their intended goals and explores how enforcement structures can bridge this gap. The findings have direct implications for AI governance debates around voluntary safety commitments by industry actors.
Key Points
- •Voluntary commitments alone are generally insufficient to produce socially beneficial outcomes due to lack of accountability.
- •Enforcement mechanisms are necessary complements to voluntary pledges to ensure compliance and meaningful impact.
- •The paper draws on social science and governance theory to analyze when and why self-regulation fails.
- •Findings challenge the effectiveness of industry-led voluntary AI safety commitments without regulatory backing.
- •Suggests that hybrid governance models combining voluntary action with enforcement are more likely to succeed.
Cited by 2 pages
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| AI Policy Effectiveness | Analysis | 64.0 |
| Voluntary AI Safety Commitments | Policy | 91.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Apr 9, 202629 KB
Voluntary safety commitments provide an escape from over-regulation in AI development - ScienceDirect
Mar
APR
May
17
2023
2024
2025
success
fail
About this capture
COLLECTED BY
Organization: Archive Team
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Collection: Archive Team: URLs
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20240417234815/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160791X21003183
JavaScript is disabled on your browser.
Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page.
Skip to main contentSkip to article
ScienceDirect
Journals & Books
Search
RegisterSign in
Access through your institution
Purchase PDF
Search ScienceDirect
Article preview
Abstract
Introduction
Section snippets
... (truncated, 29 KB total)Resource ID:
cca85af69dffa3bd | Stable ID: sid_Q9nb8Rpc1B