Longterm Wiki
Back

GovAI, *Safety Not Guaranteed: International Strategic Dynamics of Risky Technology Races* (https://governance.ai/res...

government

Data Status

Not fetched

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
Capability-Alignment Race ModelAnalysis62.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Feb 23, 20265 KB
Safety Not Guaranteed: International Strategic Dynamics of Risky Technology Races | GovAI 

 

 

 About Research Opportunities Team Analysis Alumni Updates Donate About Research Opportunities Team Analysis Alumni Updates Donate Safety Not Guaranteed: International Strategic Dynamics of Risky Technology Races

 

 The great powers appear to be entering an era of heightened competition to master security-relevant technologies in areas such as AI. This is concerning because deploying new technologies can create substantial shared risks, such as inadvertent crisis escalation or uncontrolled proliferation. We analyse a strategic model to determine when states deploy technologies before learning how to minimise their risks. When competitors are moderately adversarial or the technology laggard is not very capable, the laggard does not use a risky technology unless it catches up to the technology leader. By contrast, if competitors are highly adversarial and the laggard is closer to the leader’s capability level, the laggard is willing to cut corners to gamble for advantage, so that the shared risk falls if the laggard catches up. Further, when competitors are not deploying the riskiest technologies, steps to make those technologies safer will be attenuated or reversed by risk compensation.

 Read paper Read paper Theme

 Political Science and International Relations Date

 November 1, 2022

 author

 s

 Eoghan Stafford, Robert Trager and Allan Dafoe

 Share

 Research Summary

 Footnotes

 Further reading

 Related publications

 Political Science and International Relations

 Options and Motivations for International AI Benefit Sharing

 February 2025

 GovAI Report

 Claire Dennis, Sam Manning, Stephen Clare, Boxi Wu, Jake Okechukwu Effoduh, Chinasa T. Okolo, Lennart Heim, Katya Klinova

 Advanced AI systems could generate substantial economic and other societal benefits, but these benefits may not be widely shared by default. For a range of reasons, a number of prominent actors and institutions have called for...

 Political Science and International Relations

 What Should Be Internationalised in AI Governance?

 November 2024

 Whitepaper

 Claire Dennis et al.

 As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, states increasingly recognise the need for international governance to address shared benefits and challenges. However, international cooperation is complex and...

 Political Science and International Relations

 Voice and Access in AI: Global AI Majority Participation in Artificial Intelligence Development and Governance

 October 2024

 Whitepaper

 Sumaya N. Adan, Robert Trager, Kayla Blomquist, Claire Dennis, Gemma Edom, Lucia Velasco, Cecil Abungu, Ben Garfinkel, et al.

 This white paper investigates practical remedies to increase voice in and access to AI governance and capabilities for the Global AI Majority, while addressing the security and commercial concerns of frontier AI states.

 Political Science and International Relations

 Opt

... (truncated, 5 KB total)
Resource ID: e0a695ac99bfa019 | Stable ID: MDc1Y2M1Nz