AI Impacts Reanalysis
webAuthors
Credibility Rating
Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.
Rating inherited from publication venue: AI Impacts
This reanalysis is relevant for researchers interpreting expert consensus on AI timelines and risks, building on the influential 2023 AI Impacts survey that polled hundreds of ML researchers on transformative AI expectations.
Metadata
Summary
Tom Adamczewski reexamines the 2023 AI Impacts Expert Survey on Progress in AI, applying improved data analysis methods and enhanced visualizations. The reanalysis provides an open-source codebase to enable reproducibility and further exploration of the survey data. It offers a deeper look at expert predictions regarding AI timelines and transformative AI risks.
Key Points
- •Reanalyzes the widely-cited 2023 AI Impacts Expert Survey on Progress in AI with enhanced statistical methods.
- •Provides improved data visualizations to better communicate expert opinion distributions on AI timelines and risks.
- •Releases an open-source codebase to support reproducibility and community exploration of the survey findings.
- •Offers a more nuanced picture of expert beliefs about transformative AI and potential existential risk timelines.
- •Complements the original survey by surfacing patterns or insights that may not have been prominent in the initial analysis.
Review
Cached Content Preview
Reanalyzing the 2023 Expert Survey on Progress in AI AI Impacts blog Subscribe Sign in Reanalyzing the 2023 Expert Survey on Progress in AI With new charts, and a newly open-source codebase Ben Weinstein-Raun Dec 16, 2024 6 Share An illustration of the central range of expert responses, when asked about the timeline of automating all human labor. There’s a new report on the AI Impacts web site, that focuses on reanalyzing the data from the 2023 Expert Survey on Progress in AI (originally written up in Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI ). A (mostly) analogous chart to the above, this one from the original paper The report, by Tom Adamczewski , introduces several improvements over the earlier analysis. Even better, it comes with a brand new open-source codebase , also by Tom, that anyone can use to perform their own analyses on the data. I found the report illuminating, and I recommend it to anyone interested in the tradeoffs and options available in eliciting, analyzing, and presenting quantitative estimates from experts. Plus there are many excellent new graphs! 6 Share Discussion about this post Comments Restacks Top Latest Discussions No posts Ready for more? Subscribe © 2026 AI Impacts · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start your Substack Get the app Substack is the home for great culture This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts
f23914664a3c2379 | Stable ID: sid_qJ6yWO4SbF