Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Persily, Journal of Democracy (2017)

web

Relevant to AI safety discussions around AI-enabled disinformation, information manipulation, and the governance challenges posed by algorithmic systems influencing public discourse and democratic integrity.

Metadata

Importance: 45/100journal articleanalysis

Summary

Nathaniel Persily analyzes how the internet and social media shaped the 2016 U.S. election, examining the roles of disinformation, filter bubbles, foreign interference, and microtargeting in undermining democratic processes. The article questions whether democratic institutions can adapt to the information ecosystem created by digital platforms. It serves as an early authoritative diagnosis of internet-era threats to democratic governance.

Key Points

  • Social media platforms enabled unprecedented spread of disinformation and foreign interference in the 2016 U.S. election.
  • Filter bubbles and algorithmic curation may reinforce polarization by limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints.
  • Microtargeting of voters by political campaigns raises concerns about manipulation and lack of transparency.
  • Traditional democratic norms and regulatory frameworks are ill-equipped to handle the speed and scale of internet-driven influence operations.
  • The piece raises systemic questions about whether liberal democracy can remain robust in a high-misinformation digital environment.

Cited by 1 page

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Apr 10, 20263 KB
The 2016 U.S. Election: Can Democracy Survive the Internet? | Journal of Democracy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 The 2016 U.S. Election: Can Democracy Survive the Internet?

 
 Nathaniel Persily 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 Issue Date 
 April 2017 
 
 
 Volume 
 28
 
 
 Issue 
 2
 
 
 Page Numbers 
 63-76
 
 
 
 file 
 Print
 
 
 
 
 arrow-down-thin 
 Download from Project MUSE
 
 
 
 
 external 
 View Citation
 
 
 

 
 
 
 Select your citation format: 

 MLA (Modern Language Association 8th edition) Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note) APA (American Psychological Association 7th edition) 
 
 
 
 

 
 The 2016 presidential election represents the latest chapter in the disintegration of the legacy institutions that had set bounds for U.S. politics in the postwar era. It is tempting (and in many ways correct) to view the Donald Trump campaign as unprecedented in its breaking of established norms of politics. Yet this type of campaign could only be successful because established institutions—especially the mainstream media and political-party organizations—had already lost most of their power, both in the United States and around the world. The void that these eroding institutions left was filled by an unmediated populist nationalism tailor-made for the Internet age.

 
 
 About the Author 

 
 
 Nathaniel Persily is James B. McClatchy Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. 

 
 
 View all work by Nathaniel Persily 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PDF 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Download Complimentary PDF
 
 

 
 
 Supplements

 
 
 PDF Full-Format Endnotes – Can Democracy Survive the Internet 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 Subject 

 
 Democratic decline , Media , Social media 

 
 
 Region 

 
 Advanced Democracies , North America 

 
 
 Country 

 
 United States 

 
 
 
 Share 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 Further Reading

 
 
 
 Volume 30, Issue 2 

 
 30 Years After Tiananmen: Memory in the Era of Xi Jinping 

 
 Glenn Tiffert 

 
 
 
 Xi reads Tiananmen as a cautionary tale, and he has sought to centralize power and reverse years of ideological atrophy. By controlling the past, he is trying to determine how…

 
 
 
 
 Volume 31, Issue 3 

 
 Social Media Disruption: Messaging Mistrust in Latin America 

 
 Noam Lupu 

 Mariana V. Ramírez Bustamante 

 Elizabeth J. Zechmeister 

 
 
 
 In Latin America, greater exposure to social media—and the digital misinformation that comes with it—seems to be bolstering prodemocratic attitudes even as it fuels public distrust in democratic institutions.

 
 
 
 
 Volume 36, Issue 4 

 
 Why Bitcoin Is Freedom Money 

 
 Alex Gladstein 

 
 
 
 Today, governments can see who buys what, who pays whom, and who donates to which cause. But they cannot easily trace or confiscate Bitcoin. The digital currency offers a lifeline…

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 Search for: search 
 
 
 close
Resource ID: f851386fb4baf09d | Stable ID: sid_HzKZnSTSs0