Stakeholder: Chamber of Progress (unknown)
The record identifies Chamber of Progress as a stakeholder with 'unknown' status regarding SB 1047. The source text extensively documents Chamber of Progress's involvement as an opponent of SB 1047, confirming its role as a policy stakeholder. The source provides the organization's website (progresschamber.org) and describes its mission. While the record shows 'unknown' for key fields, the source confirms Chamber of Progress is indeed a relevant stakeholder in this AI policy matter. The record is accurate but minimal; the source provides additional context that could populate those unknown fields.
Our claim
entire record- Stakeholder
- Chamber of Progress
- Stakeholder
- Chamber of Progress
- Position
- oppose
- Importance
- medium
- Reason
- Led tech coalition urging Newsom to veto; stated 'The California legislature is passing laws based on science fiction fantasies'; co-signed August 27, 2024 joint veto letter with Bay Area Council, Engine, NetChoice, R Street Institute, and others
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkNoteThe record identifies Chamber of Progress as a stakeholder with 'unknown' status regarding SB 1047. The source text extensively documents Chamber of Progress's involvement as an opponent of SB 1047, confirming its role as a policy stakeholder. The source provides the organization's website (progresschamber.org) and describes its mission. While the record shows 'unknown' for key fields, the source confirms Chamber of Progress is indeed a relevant stakeholder in this AI policy matter. The record is accurate but minimal; the source provides additional context that could populate those unknown fields.