Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
policy-stakeholder

Chamber of Progress on Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act

Child of Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act

Metadata

Source Tablepolicy_stakeholders
Source IDVw4-yHf4Ur
Source URLprogresschamber.org/news/ca-legislature-passes-ai-bill/
ParentSafe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act
Children
CreatedMar 29, 2026, 10:42 PM
UpdatedApr 18, 2026, 10:33 AM
SyncedApr 18, 2026, 10:33 AM

Record Data

idVw4-yHf4Ur
policyEntityIdSafe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act(policy)
stakeholderEntityIdChamber of Progress(organization)
stakeholderDisplayNameChamber of Progress
positionoppose
importancemedium
reasonLed tech coalition urging Newsom to veto; stated 'The California legislature is passing laws based on science fiction fantasies'; co-signed August 27, 2024 joint veto letter with Bay Area Council, Engine, NetChoice, R Street Institute, and others
sourceprogresschamber.org/news/ca-legislature-passes-ai-bill/
context

Source Check Verdicts

confirmed95% confidence

Last checked: 4/16/2026

The record identifies Chamber of Progress as a stakeholder with 'unknown' status regarding SB 1047. The source text extensively documents Chamber of Progress's involvement as an opponent of SB 1047, confirming its role as a policy stakeholder. The source provides the organization's website (progresschamber.org) and describes its mission. While the record shows 'unknown' for key fields, the source confirms Chamber of Progress is indeed a relevant stakeholder in this AI policy matter. The record is accurate but minimal; the source provides additional context that could populate those unknown fields.

Debug info

Thing ID: Vw4-yHf4Ur

Source Table: policy_stakeholders

Source ID: Vw4-yHf4Ur

Parent Thing ID: sid_XcGTez1oFw