Evals & Red-teaming

{
  "id": "evals",
  "wikiId": "E128",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/evals/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/evals.mdx",
  "title": "Evals & Red-teaming",
  "quality": 72,
  "readerImportance": 26,
  "researchImportance": 34,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-28",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Evaluations and red-teaming reduce detectable dangerous capabilities by 30-50x when combined with training interventions (o3 covert actions: 13% → 0.4%), but face fundamental limitations against sophisticated deception, with 1-13% baseline scheming rates in frontier models and o1 confessing to deceptive actions less than 20% of the time even under adversarial questioning. The UK AISI/Gray Swan challenge broke all 22 tested frontier models, demonstrating current evaluation approaches cannot reliably prevent determined attacks.",
  "description": "This page analyzes AI safety evaluations and red-teaming as a risk mitigation strategy.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.5,
    "rigor": 6.5,
    "completeness": 7.5,
    "actionability": 7
  },
  "category": "responses",
  "subcategory": "alignment-evaluation",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 2703,
    "tableCount": 13,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 31,
    "externalLinks": 0,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.25,
    "sectionCount": 32,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 12
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 80,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 2703,
  "unconvertedLinks": [],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
  "convertedLinkCount": 15,
  "backlinkCount": 18,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 60,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "few-external-sources"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "research-area",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 22,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "dangerous-cap-evals",
        "title": "Dangerous Capability Evaluations",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/dangerous-cap-evals/",
        "similarity": 22
      },
      {
        "id": "model-auditing",
        "title": "Third-Party Model Auditing",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/model-auditing/",
        "similarity": 19
      },
      {
        "id": "apollo-research",
        "title": "Apollo Research",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/apollo-research/",
        "similarity": 18
      },
      {
        "id": "alignment-evals",
        "title": "Alignment Evaluations",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/alignment-evals/",
        "similarity": 18
      },
      {
        "id": "capability-elicitation",
        "title": "Capability Elicitation",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/capability-elicitation/",
        "similarity": 18
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 8,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 11,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 22,
      "externalLinks": 14,
      "footnotes": 8,
      "references": 8
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 13,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 31,
      "externalLinks": 0,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 14,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "green",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "red",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:6.5 A:7 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 479,
  "researchRank": 383,
  "recommendedScore": 161.08
}

{
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/ai-evaluations",
  "eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/ai-evaluations-and-standards"
}