Intervention Effectiveness Matrix
intervention-effectiveness-matrixanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/intervention-effectiveness-matrix/
E177Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "intervention-effectiveness-matrix",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/intervention-effectiveness-matrix/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/models/intervention-effectiveness-matrix.mdx",
"title": "Intervention Effectiveness Matrix",
"quality": 73,
"readerImportance": 89.5,
"researchImportance": 7,
"tacticalValue": 58,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Quantitative analysis mapping 15+ AI safety interventions to specific risks reveals critical misallocation: 40% of 2024 funding (\\$400M+) flows to RLHF methods showing only 10-20% effectiveness against deceptive alignment, while interpretability research (\\$52M total, 40-50% effectiveness) and AI Control (70-80% theoretical effectiveness, \\$10M funding) remain severely underfunded. Provides explicit reallocation recommendations: reduce RLHF from 40% to 25%, increase interpretability from 15% to 30%, and establish AI Control at 20% of technical safety budgets.",
"description": "This model maps 15+ AI safety interventions to specific risk categories with quantitative effectiveness estimates derived from empirical research and expert elicitation. Analysis reveals critical resource misallocation: 40% of 2024 funding (\\$400M+) went to RLHF-based methods showing only 10-20% effectiveness against deceptive alignment, while interpretability research (\\$52M, demonstrating 40-50% effectiveness) remains severely underfunded relative to gap severity.",
"ratings": {
"focus": 8.5,
"novelty": 6.5,
"rigor": 7,
"completeness": 8,
"concreteness": 8.5,
"actionability": 9
},
"category": "models",
"subcategory": "intervention-models",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance",
"community"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 4205,
"tableCount": 32,
"diagramCount": 3,
"internalLinks": 88,
"externalLinks": 21,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.05,
"sectionCount": 58,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 15
},
"suggestedQuality": 100,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 4205,
"unconvertedLinks": [
{
"text": "Coefficient Giving 2024 Report",
"url": "https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/our-progress-in-2024-and-plans-for-2025/",
"resourceId": "7ca35422b79c3ac9",
"resourceTitle": "Open Philanthropy: Progress in 2024 and Plans for 2025"
},
{
"text": "AI Safety Funding Analysis",
"url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/XdhwXppfqrpPL2YDX/an-overview-of-the-ai-safety-funding-situation",
"resourceId": "80125fcaf04609b8",
"resourceTitle": "Overview of AI Safety Funding"
},
{
"text": "AI Control",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.06942",
"resourceId": "cc80ab28579c5794",
"resourceTitle": "Redwood Research's AI Control paper (December 2023)"
},
{
"text": "GovAI research",
"url": "https://www.governance.ai/analysis/computing-power-and-the-governance-of-ai",
"resourceId": "482b71342542a659",
"resourceTitle": "GovAI - Computing Power and the Governance of AI"
},
{
"text": "RAND analysis",
"url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3776-1.html",
"resourceId": "a3e39f7b4281936a",
"resourceTitle": "RAND research"
},
{
"text": "METR's December 2025 analysis",
"url": "https://metr.org/blog/2025-12-09-common-elements-of-frontier-ai-safety-policies/",
"resourceId": "c8782940b880d00f",
"resourceTitle": "METR's analysis of 12 companies"
},
{
"text": "openphilanthropy.org",
"url": "https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/our-progress-in-2024-and-plans-for-2025/",
"resourceId": "7ca35422b79c3ac9",
"resourceTitle": "Open Philanthropy: Progress in 2024 and Plans for 2025"
},
{
"text": "EA Forum",
"url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/XdhwXppfqrpPL2YDX/an-overview-of-the-ai-safety-funding-situation",
"resourceId": "80125fcaf04609b8",
"resourceTitle": "Overview of AI Safety Funding"
},
{
"text": "arXiv",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.06942",
"resourceId": "cc80ab28579c5794",
"resourceTitle": "Redwood Research's AI Control paper (December 2023)"
},
{
"text": "metr.org",
"url": "https://metr.org/blog/2025-12-09-common-elements-of-frontier-ai-safety-policies/",
"resourceId": "c8782940b880d00f",
"resourceTitle": "METR's analysis of 12 companies"
},
{
"text": "governance.ai",
"url": "https://www.governance.ai/analysis/computing-power-and-the-governance-of-ai",
"resourceId": "482b71342542a659",
"resourceTitle": "GovAI - Computing Power and the Governance of AI"
},
{
"text": "rand.org",
"url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3776-1.html",
"resourceId": "a3e39f7b4281936a",
"resourceTitle": "RAND research"
}
],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 12,
"convertedLinkCount": 55,
"backlinkCount": 4,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 40,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"high-rigor"
]
},
"entityType": "analysis",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 20,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "ai-control",
"title": "AI Control",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/ai-control/",
"similarity": 20
},
{
"id": "sleeper-agent-detection",
"title": "Sleeper Agent Detection",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/sleeper-agent-detection/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "technical-research",
"title": "Technical AI Safety Research",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/technical-research/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "technical-pathways",
"title": "Technical Pathway Decomposition",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/technical-pathways/",
"similarity": 18
},
{
"id": "accident-risks",
"title": "AI Accident Risk Cruxes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/accident-risks/",
"similarity": 17
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 9,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 17,
"diagrams": 2,
"internalLinks": 34,
"externalLinks": 21,
"footnotes": 13,
"references": 13
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 32,
"diagrams": 3,
"internalLinks": 88,
"externalLinks": 21,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 39,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "green",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "green",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:6.5 R:7 A:9 C:8"
},
"readerRank": 23,
"researchRank": 573,
"recommendedScore": 212.61
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (4)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| safety-research-allocation | AI Safety Research Allocation Model | analysis | related |
| ai-acceleration-tradeoff | AI Acceleration Tradeoff Model | analysis | — |
| __index__/knowledge-base/models | Analytical Models | concept | — |
| safety-capability-tradeoff | Safety-Capability Tradeoff Model | analysis | — |