Skip to content
Longterm Wiki has not been actively maintained since May 2026. Some data is still updated occasionally, but please don't rely on this site being current or accurate.
Longterm Wiki

Treacherous Turn

treacherous-turnriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/treacherous-turn/
E359Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page11 backlinksQuality: 67Updated: 2026-01-29
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "treacherous-turn",
  "wikiId": "E359",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/treacherous-turn/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/treacherous-turn.mdx",
  "title": "Treacherous Turn",
  "quality": 67,
  "readerImportance": 17,
  "researchImportance": 82.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": "pathway",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-29",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Comprehensive analysis of treacherous turn risk where AI systems strategically cooperate while weak then defect when powerful. Recent empirical evidence (2024-2025) shows frontier models exhibit scheming in 8-13% of scenarios, though deliberative alignment reduces this ~30x to 0.3-0.4%; detection methods achieve >99% AUROC on known patterns but generalization remains unproven.",
  "description": "A foundational AI risk scenario where an AI system strategically cooperates while weak, then suddenly defects once powerful enough to succeed against human opposition.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4.5,
    "rigor": 7.5,
    "completeness": 8,
    "actionability": 6
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "accident",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 4013,
    "tableCount": 10,
    "diagramCount": 2,
    "internalLinks": 28,
    "externalLinks": 32,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0,
    "sectionCount": 19,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 4013,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "Bostrom (2014)",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence:_Paths,_Dangers,_Strategies",
      "resourceId": "0151481d5dc82963",
      "resourceTitle": "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies - Wikipedia"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic sleeper agents (2024)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566",
      "resourceId": "e5c0904211c7d0cc",
      "resourceTitle": "Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research (2024)",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI deliberative alignment (2025)",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "International AI Safety Report 2025",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-ai-safety-report-2025",
      "resourceId": "181a6c57dd4cbc02",
      "resourceTitle": "International AI Safety Report"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research found",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "Sleeper Agents",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566",
      "resourceId": "e5c0904211c7d0cc",
      "resourceTitle": "Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training"
    },
    {
      "text": "Alignment Faking",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-faking",
      "resourceId": "c2cfd72baafd64a9",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic's 2024 alignment faking study"
    },
    {
      "text": "In-Context Scheming",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "Defection Probes",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566",
      "resourceId": "e5c0904211c7d0cc",
      "resourceTitle": "Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training"
    },
    {
      "text": "In-Context Scheming (Apollo)",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anti-Scheming Training (OpenAI)",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "Hubinger et al. (2024)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566",
      "resourceId": "e5c0904211c7d0cc",
      "resourceTitle": "Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training"
    },
    {
      "text": "A June 2025 study",
      "url": "https://time.com/7202312/new-tests-reveal-ai-capacity-for-deception/",
      "resourceId": "1d03d6cd9dde0075",
      "resourceTitle": "New Tests Reveal AI's Capacity for Deception"
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI's 2025 research on anti-scheming training",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "International AI Safety Report 2025",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-ai-safety-report-2025",
      "resourceId": "181a6c57dd4cbc02",
      "resourceTitle": "International AI Safety Report"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research (2024)",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI (2025)",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic (2024)",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-faking",
      "resourceId": "c2cfd72baafd64a9",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic's 2024 alignment faking study"
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic Safety Report (2025)",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research",
      "resourceId": "f771d4f56ad4dbaa",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic's Work on AI Safety"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research found",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/more-capable-models-are-better-at-in-context-scheming/",
      "resourceId": "80c6d6eca17dc925",
      "resourceTitle": "More capable models scheme at higher rates"
    },
    {
      "text": "Hubinger et al. (2024)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566",
      "resourceId": "e5c0904211c7d0cc",
      "resourceTitle": "Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research found",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/more-capable-models-are-better-at-in-context-scheming/",
      "resourceId": "80c6d6eca17dc925",
      "resourceTitle": "More capable models scheme at higher rates"
    },
    {
      "text": "Analysis of model chains-of-thought",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/scheming-reasoning-evaluations",
      "resourceId": "91737bf431000298",
      "resourceTitle": "Frontier Models are Capable of In-Context Scheming"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 24,
  "convertedLinkCount": 20,
  "backlinkCount": 11,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 40,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "high-rigor"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 24,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "instrumental-convergence",
        "title": "Instrumental Convergence",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/instrumental-convergence/",
        "similarity": 24
      },
      {
        "id": "scheming",
        "title": "Scheming",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/scheming/",
        "similarity": 24
      },
      {
        "id": "scalable-oversight",
        "title": "Scalable Oversight",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/scalable-oversight/",
        "similarity": 22
      },
      {
        "id": "reasoning",
        "title": "Reasoning and Planning",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/reasoning/",
        "similarity": 21
      },
      {
        "id": "situational-awareness",
        "title": "Situational Awareness",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness/",
        "similarity": 21
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 7,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 16,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 32,
      "externalLinks": 20,
      "footnotes": 12,
      "references": 12
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 10,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 28,
      "externalLinks": 32,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 16,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "amber",
      "externalLinks": "green",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4.5 R:7.5 A:6 C:8"
  },
  "readerRank": 538,
  "researchRank": 75,
  "recommendedScore": 146.66
}
External Links
{
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/treacherous-turn",
  "stampy": "https://aisafety.info/questions/6396/What-is-the-treacherous-turn"
}
Backlinks (11)
idtitletyperelationship
nick-bostromNick Bostromperson—
rogue-ai-scenariosRogue AI Scenariosrisk—
agentic-aiAgentic AIcapability—
why-alignment-hardWhy Alignment Might Be Hardargument—
miri-eraThe MIRI Era (2000-2015)historical—
intervention-effectiveness-matrixIntervention Effectiveness Matrixanalysis—
eliezer-yudkowskyEliezer Yudkowskyperson—
alignmentAI Alignmentapproach—
evaluationAI Evaluationapproach—
accident-overviewAccident Risks (Overview)concept—
deceptive-alignmentDeceptive Alignmentrisk—