Whistleblower Dynamics Model
whistleblower-dynamicsanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/whistleblower-dynamics/
E371Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "whistleblower-dynamics",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/whistleblower-dynamics/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/models/whistleblower-dynamics.mdx",
"title": "Whistleblower Dynamics Model",
"quality": 56,
"readerImportance": 71,
"researchImportance": 85,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Analyzes whistleblower dynamics in AI labs using expected utility framework, estimating current barriers suppress 70-90% of critical safety information compared to optimal transparency. Quantifies intervention costs (\\$1-15M for legislation, \\$2-5M/year for legal defense) and maps four equilibrium scenarios with probabilities, identifying legal protection and organizational culture as key leverage points.",
"description": "This model analyzes information flow from AI insiders to the public. It estimates significant barriers reduce whistleblowing by 70-90% compared to optimal transparency.",
"ratings": {
"focus": 8.5,
"novelty": 6.2,
"rigor": 5.8,
"completeness": 7.5,
"concreteness": 7,
"actionability": 6.5
},
"category": "models",
"subcategory": "governance-models",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 6390,
"tableCount": 8,
"diagramCount": 1,
"internalLinks": 1,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.04,
"sectionCount": 50,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 11
},
"suggestedQuality": 73,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 6390,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 0,
"backlinkCount": 0,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 60,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources"
]
},
"entityType": "analysis",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 22,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "authoritarian-tools-diffusion",
"title": "Authoritarian Tools Diffusion Model",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/authoritarian-tools-diffusion/",
"similarity": 22
},
{
"id": "institutional-capture",
"title": "AI-Driven Institutional Decision Capture",
"path": "/knowledge-base/risks/institutional-capture/",
"similarity": 20
},
{
"id": "safety-capability-tradeoff",
"title": "Safety-Capability Tradeoff Model",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/safety-capability-tradeoff/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "ai-safety-institutes",
"title": "AI Safety Institutes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/ai-safety-institutes/",
"similarity": 19
},
{
"id": "corporate-influence",
"title": "Corporate Influence on AI Policy",
"path": "/knowledge-base/responses/corporate-influence/",
"similarity": 19
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 4,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 26,
"diagrams": 3,
"internalLinks": 51,
"externalLinks": 32,
"footnotes": 19,
"references": 19
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 8,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 1,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 0,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "amber",
"diagrams": "amber",
"internalLinks": "amber",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "red",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:6.2 R:5.8 A:6.5 C:7.5"
},
"readerRank": 159,
"researchRank": 56,
"recommendedScore": 169.36
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (0)
No backlinks