Capabilities-to-Safety Pipeline Model
capabilities-to-safety-pipelineanalysisPath: /knowledge-base/models/capabilities-to-safety-pipeline/
E51Entity ID (EID)
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
"id": "capabilities-to-safety-pipeline",
"numericId": null,
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/capabilities-to-safety-pipeline/",
"filePath": "knowledge-base/models/capabilities-to-safety-pipeline.mdx",
"title": "Capabilities-to-Safety Pipeline Model",
"quality": 73,
"readerImportance": 45.5,
"researchImportance": 63.5,
"tacticalValue": null,
"contentFormat": "article",
"tractability": null,
"neglectedness": null,
"uncertainty": null,
"causalLevel": null,
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-13",
"dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
"llmSummary": "Quantitative pipeline model finds only 200-400 ML researchers transition to safety work annually (far below 1,000-2,000 needed), with 60-75% blocked at consideration-to-action stage. MATS training programs achieve 60-80% conversion rates at \\$20-40K per researcher, while fellowships cost \\$50-100K; coordinated \\$50M annual investment could plausibly double transition rates within 2-3 years.",
"description": "This model analyzes researcher transitions from capabilities to safety work, finding only 10-15% of aware researchers consider switching, with 60-75% blocked by barriers at the consideration-to-action stage. Major intervention potential exists through training programs and fellowships.",
"ratings": {
"focus": 9,
"novelty": 6.5,
"rigor": 7.5,
"completeness": 8.5,
"concreteness": 8.5,
"actionability": 8
},
"category": "models",
"subcategory": "safety-models",
"clusters": [
"ai-safety",
"governance"
],
"metrics": {
"wordCount": 1328,
"tableCount": 22,
"diagramCount": 2,
"internalLinks": 26,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnoteCount": 0,
"bulletRatio": 0.02,
"sectionCount": 37,
"hasOverview": true,
"structuralScore": 12
},
"suggestedQuality": 80,
"updateFrequency": 90,
"evergreen": true,
"wordCount": 1328,
"unconvertedLinks": [],
"unconvertedLinkCount": 0,
"convertedLinkCount": 23,
"backlinkCount": 4,
"hallucinationRisk": {
"level": "medium",
"score": 45,
"factors": [
"no-citations",
"few-external-sources",
"high-rigor"
]
},
"entityType": "analysis",
"redundancy": {
"maxSimilarity": 15,
"similarPages": [
{
"id": "ai-talent-market-dynamics",
"title": "AI Talent Market Dynamics",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/ai-talent-market-dynamics/",
"similarity": 15
},
{
"id": "safety-researcher-gap",
"title": "AI Safety Talent Supply/Demand Gap Model",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/safety-researcher-gap/",
"similarity": 15
},
{
"id": "ai-risk-portfolio-analysis",
"title": "AI Risk Portfolio Analysis",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/ai-risk-portfolio-analysis/",
"similarity": 14
},
{
"id": "safety-research-value",
"title": "Expected Value of AI Safety Research",
"path": "/knowledge-base/models/safety-research-value/",
"similarity": 14
},
{
"id": "epistemic-risks",
"title": "AI Epistemic Cruxes",
"path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/epistemic-risks/",
"similarity": 13
}
]
},
"coverage": {
"passing": 8,
"total": 13,
"targets": {
"tables": 5,
"diagrams": 1,
"internalLinks": 11,
"externalLinks": 7,
"footnotes": 4,
"references": 4
},
"actuals": {
"tables": 22,
"diagrams": 2,
"internalLinks": 26,
"externalLinks": 0,
"footnotes": 0,
"references": 15,
"quotesWithQuotes": 0,
"quotesTotal": 0,
"accuracyChecked": 0,
"accuracyTotal": 0
},
"items": {
"llmSummary": "green",
"schedule": "green",
"entity": "green",
"editHistory": "red",
"overview": "green",
"tables": "green",
"diagrams": "green",
"internalLinks": "green",
"externalLinks": "red",
"footnotes": "red",
"references": "green",
"quotes": "red",
"accuracy": "red"
},
"ratingsString": "N:6.5 R:7.5 A:8 C:8.5"
},
"readerRank": 333,
"researchRank": 198,
"recommendedScore": 190.2
}External Links
No external links
Backlinks (4)
| id | title | type | relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| safety-researcher-gap | AI Safety Researcher Gap Model | analysis | related |
| ai-talent-market-dynamics | AI Talent Market Dynamics | analysis | — |
| intervention-effectiveness-matrix | Intervention Effectiveness Matrix | analysis | — |
| racing-dynamics-impact | Racing Dynamics Impact Model | analysis | — |